Investing in Precious Metals 101 ad

Break-Through Energy Technologies

Login or register to post comments Last Post 2985 reads   13 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 13 total)
  • Sat, May 07, 2016 - 06:19am

    #1
    AnisaAmpatuan

    AnisaAmpatuan

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: May 07 2016

    Posts: 1

    count placeholder

    Break-Through Energy Technologies

Here is a link to the Summary of Break-Through Energy Technologies presented to The President of the United States and Members of the US Congress by Steven M. Greer, MD and Theodore C. Loder III, PhD.

http://siriusdisclosure.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Energy.pdf

The same group, SIRIUS Disclosure, successfully funded and published SIRIUS The Movie, which documents the origin and motives for clean energy suppression. This movie was the largest CrowdFunded documentary on record and has global circulation. Has anyone here seen SIRIUS the movie?  I would like to hear your impression and comments. It used to cost $5 to view, but is now free. Here is a link:

With 270 days remaining, the campaign named “Unacknowledged” – a campaign to end clean energy suppression, has raised $157K, toward a goal of $500K. A short preview of the work in progress documentary named “Unacknowledged” is available here:

Again, I would like to hear your impression and comments on this matter.

  • Sun, Jun 05, 2016 - 12:40pm

    #2
    lathechuck

    lathechuck

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 05 2016

    Posts: 3

    count placeholder

    Sorry, but we still believe in thermodynamics

The three laws of thermodynamics, paraphrased:

1. You can't win.  (You can't create energy, even from quantum vacuum fluctuations).

2. You can't break even. (There's always some loss in energy conversion.)

3. You can't get out of the game.

 

Most of the schemes listed in the PDF violate these rules.  However, the one about "plasma arc" is not absurd, if it allows hazardous chemicals to be converted into less harmful chemicals, whether or not it also produces useful energy.  A full systems-analysis, though, would need to include the energy investment of bringing the feedstock to the reactor, and disposing of the waste products. 

The myth of "suppressed technology" never dies, but has it EVER been demonstrated as true?  The only example I can think of is alcohol prohibition, which prevented farmers from brewing and distilling their own fuel.  But there was nothing secret about that (though it was obscured by the prohibition of alcohol for human consumption).

  • Mon, Jun 06, 2016 - 12:33am

    #3

    Mike Dill

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Nov 08 2009

    Posts: 28

    count placeholder

    Sounds like cold fusion

Show me an indepently validated study….

  • Sun, Jul 10, 2016 - 02:30am

    #4

    Elaisa Kasan

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 16 2011

    Posts: 10

    count placeholder

    Show me an independent validated study . . .

Here is a link to multiple independent validated studies:

Validation Reports

 

 

  • Sun, Jul 10, 2016 - 05:41am

    #5
    skipr

    skipr

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 09 2016

    Posts: 127

    count placeholder

    show me a working prototype

This reminds me of how Dr Edward Teller, the so called father of the H-bomb, predicted that we would have nuclear fusion energy in 4 years, which would have been in the late 50s.  The last I heard the Nuclear Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore Labs couldn't come close to zero net energy with a football stadium size high energy laser system and billions of bucks.  UFOs are not going to save us.

  • Mon, Jul 11, 2016 - 10:40pm

    #6

    VTSkier

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 06 2009

    Posts: 7

    count placeholder

    The more accepted term is LENR, get with the times!

Wow! $100 Million Contract Signed For LENR

  • Tue, Jul 12, 2016 - 02:27am

    #7

    Arthur Robey

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 03 2010

    Posts: 1814

    count placeholder

    Reality is what you observe.

The Quantum Erasure Experiment shows us that the Past is adjusted to support the Present observation. 

If we observe an excess of energy then the past has to be adjusted to support the Observation. 

The model, no matter how dear, has to be discarded.  Your reaction to the loss of your pet model is a personal affair, deeply bound up in your ego. 

I was thinking today that if Anyons exist between Fermions  and Bosons then electrons may develop an immunity to the Coulomb barrier.  But in that model the electron would combine with a proton and form a neutron. But no neutrons are observed but transmutation is. Now either I modify, discard or hold in abeyance my model. See how it works?

I hold it in abeyance. The thermalization of the mass is being considered by finer minds than my own .

If you are interested in this model you can start here.

http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2011/08/31/anyons-anyone

  • Mon, Sep 05, 2016 - 08:16am

    #8

    Elaisa Kasan

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 16 2011

    Posts: 10

    count placeholder

    The laws of thermodynamics do not prohibit these energy sources.

Your response indicates you did not read the independent validation reports.

Newer validations are posted on their web site, but these are adequate.

http://brilliantlightpower.com/validation-reports/

  • Tue, Dec 06, 2016 - 10:29pm

    #9
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Fats Oils and Greases

Max Keiser visits Piedmont Biofuels, a community-scale biodiesel project in Pittsboro, North Carolina, to talk to its president and co-founder, Lyle Estill.

https://youtu.be/9qgKhZuCyYg?t=12m25s

  • Wed, Dec 07, 2016 - 01:03am

    #10

    Arthur Robey

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 03 2010

    Posts: 1814

    count placeholder

    A belief

Belief?

Science is evidence based.

Belief belongs in the realm of Religion.

If Genesis is an ongoing process and it is observed., then the scientific method insists that you abandon your belief and go and stand in the religious camp, along with other notables such as the Flat Earthers.

My apologies for being so harsh but I feel as though I am playing Whack-a-Mole with a very persistent mole.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 13 total)

Login or Register to post comments