Break-Through Energy Technologies
Here is a link to the Summary of Break-Through Energy Technologies presented to The President of the United States and Members of the US Congress by Steven M. Greer, MD and Theodore C. Loder III, PhD.
The same group, SIRIUS Disclosure, successfully funded and published SIRIUS The Movie, which documents the origin and motives for clean energy suppression. This movie was the largest CrowdFunded documentary on record and has global circulation. Has anyone here seen SIRIUS the movie? I would like to hear your impression and comments. It used to cost $5 to view, but is now free. Here is a link:
With 270 days remaining, the campaign named “Unacknowledged” – a campaign to end clean energy suppression, has raised $157K, toward a goal of $500K. A short preview of the work in progress documentary named “Unacknowledged” is available here:
Again, I would like to hear your impression and comments on this matter.
The three laws of thermodynamics, paraphrased:
1. You can't win. (You can't create energy, even from quantum vacuum fluctuations).
2. You can't break even. (There's always some loss in energy conversion.)
3. You can't get out of the game.
Most of the schemes listed in the PDF violate these rules. However, the one about "plasma arc" is not absurd, if it allows hazardous chemicals to be converted into less harmful chemicals, whether or not it also produces useful energy. A full systems-analysis, though, would need to include the energy investment of bringing the feedstock to the reactor, and disposing of the waste products.
The myth of "suppressed technology" never dies, but has it EVER been demonstrated as true? The only example I can think of is alcohol prohibition, which prevented farmers from brewing and distilling their own fuel. But there was nothing secret about that (though it was obscured by the prohibition of alcohol for human consumption).
Show me an indepently validated study….
Here is a link to multiple independent validated studies:
This reminds me of how Dr Edward Teller, the so called father of the H-bomb, predicted that we would have nuclear fusion energy in 4 years, which would have been in the late 50s. The last I heard the Nuclear Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore Labs couldn't come close to zero net energy with a football stadium size high energy laser system and billions of bucks. UFOs are not going to save us.
The Quantum Erasure Experiment shows us that the Past is adjusted to support the Present observation.
If we observe an excess of energy then the past has to be adjusted to support the Observation.
The model, no matter how dear, has to be discarded. Your reaction to the loss of your pet model is a personal affair, deeply bound up in your ego.
I was thinking today that if Anyons exist between Fermions and Bosons then electrons may develop an immunity to the Coulomb barrier. But in that model the electron would combine with a proton and form a neutron. But no neutrons are observed but transmutation is. Now either I modify, discard or hold in abeyance my model. See how it works?
I hold it in abeyance. The thermalization of the mass is being considered by finer minds than my own .
If you are interested in this model you can start here.
Your response indicates you did not read the independent validation reports.
Newer validations are posted on their web site, but these are adequate.
Max Keiser visits Piedmont Biofuels, a community-scale biodiesel project in Pittsboro, North Carolina, to talk to its president and co-founder, Lyle Estill.
Science is evidence based.
Belief belongs in the realm of Religion.
If Genesis is an ongoing process and it is observed., then the scientific method insists that you abandon your belief and go and stand in the religious camp, along with other notables such as the Flat Earthers.
My apologies for being so harsh but I feel as though I am playing Whack-a-Mole with a very persistent mole.