BOMBSHELL: WHO Coronavirus PCR Test Primer Sequence is Found in All Human DNA
There are more “fishy” things going down than in the Miami Seaquarium… Why didn’t CNN et al report the papaya/goat/quail results? Or did they?
What I find fishy is why the MSM and governments are going on and on about how one “loses their smell and taste” as a sure sign of COVID…
ANYthing at all that impedes smelling such as allergies, sinus issues, common cold etc will impair smell. Once smell is impaired, refined taste is impaired because that depends on smell. The only tastes we have are salty, sweet, bitter, sour, piquante/pungent and astringent. So without smell a lemon taste like a lime – both simply sour.
I agree that this is highly coincidental.
Well it seems very suspicious at first glance, but consider that CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT is only 18 bases so 4^18 = 68,719,476,736… while the human genome is about 3 billion base pairs… so 4^1500000000, a number way beyond imagination that probably all the planet’s supercomputers together couldn’t calculate. So it doesn’t really seem highly improbable.
Not trusting any of the virology science schmience anymore. Germ theory is highly questionable, likely false. Mayer is of course part of the fake virology science program here, either knowingly or unknowingly.
Nothing would surprise me anymore, but I’d like you or anyone questioning germ theory to explain why antibacterials clearly work. That by itself is a death blow to that idea.
Noticed the genome of nOvEl cOrOnA has 33 A’s at the end? 33.
Not a bad observation, as many occultists and elitists like leaving numerologically-significant markers in their ‘work’. Does anyone know if any other viruses have this?
No, none of the “viruses” has this number. Corona is the big one. – Follow me on gab: gab.com/grandeformaggio if you need further comments on this hoax.
I have included your reply in an article covering this whole “bombshell evidence” story:
The Corona Conspiracy, Part 15: The Chromosome 8 Bombshell Evidence Canard, Frank Visser
It was very helpful!
^ Hey Frank Visser, well done, a great deconstruction of this “theory”. Let me ask you this though: Who do you think is doing more harm, those who insist on wanting to believe there is actually no virus, or those who insist on suppressing the effective treatments? I’m not sure you’re doing as much to expose the latter?
The short answer is that the PCR primers don’t need to be unique, unlike the probes.
The primers only start the DNA polymerization just outside the target DNA to be checked by the probes. Primers don’t have a fluorescent dye so they won’t be detected if they match any DNA in the sample.
The probes on the other hand, do need to be unique. They contain a fluorescent dye and a fluorescence quencher in the same molecule. When probes attach to matching DNA, the molecule quencher breaks apart from the molecule so it doesn’t hinder the dye fluorescence anymore, then the resulting fluorescence is detected by the PCR optics.