BOMBSHELL: WHO Coronavirus PCR Test Primer Sequence is Found in All Human DNA
This was important enough that I wanted to get it out immediately. My research into the NCBI database for nucleotide sequences has lead to a stunning discovery. One of the WHO primer sequences in the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 is found in all human DNA!
The sequence “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT” is an 18-character primer sequence found in the WHO coronavirus PCR testing protocol document. The primer sequences are what get amplified by the PCR process in order to be detected and designated a “positive” test result. It just so happens this exact same 18-character sequence, verbatim, is also found on Homo sapiens chromosome 8! As far as I can tell, this means that the WHO test kits should find a positive result in all humans. Can anyone explain this otherwise?
I really cannot overstate the significance of this finding. At minimum, it should have a notable impact on test results.
Perhaps Dr. Mayer can verify, or confirm/disconfirm this?
Well, that would explain a lot. or confound further.
Anyway, the test is quantitative rather than qualitative. There is a very narrow quantitative value in the test that defines whether no one is positive or everyone is positive. The range is chosen arbitrarily. So, based on the fact that they are testing a qty more than absolute.. there may still be value in it. But it can explain why there can likewise be so much error.
Haven’t verified it myself but you need two primers for a PCR test and there are lots of resources on the NCBI to design and verify the specificity of a primer set. Also, are you sure that this the one being used? Last I checked, there was a lot of FDA approved commercial tests for SARS-Cov2. You would think that if these tests were not specific enough, they would not even have been granted emergency use, let alone approval?
I recall PCR tests being used in Australia to test for chlamydia in koalas. The results were misleading because the more amplification was done, the more positives were found — false positives. The cut-off point needs to be well established.
So does this mean that any country that uses those WHO primer sequences could (or will) easily confuse human DNA with hCoV-2019/SARS-CoV-2 RNA?
As the article author writes,
As far as I can tell, this means that the WHO test kits should find a positive result in all humans. Can anyone explain this otherwise?
We know that in some countries where the testing kits would be provided by the WHO, there’s been fraud where such was attempted to be detected, such as in Tanzania where papayas, goats and quails tested positive.
This is what some doctors/experts have been saying for a while, that the PCR actually detects a piece of human DNA. They claim the Chinese didn’t isolate the virus and just found a chunk of RNA on which the PCR-tests are based.
Apologies but this is how bad information gets spread 🙁 Allow me to explain a few issues with the original link
The issue in question is with CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT, which is a 6 codon chain. The absolute failure here is that this chain is being read by everyone as a forward primer, when in fact this is a reverse primer. This is clearly stated in the WHO instructions.
A forward read of CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT gives us LPLLCCSLCCVPFVVL
A reverse read is ACAACACAACAAAGGGAG, which gives us TTQQREQHNKGNTTKG
Search the NT of hCoV-2019 yourself here for the forward string and you will not find it. Then research the reverse that I posted and you will find it every time.
You might be thinking.. why would they post the forward and then specify for reverse?! Why not just post the reverse?! One would always post forward and then specify the direction. This way we have a global standard to avoid confusion..JUST LIKE THIS.. LOL
There is no conspiracy here, no mistake, no false positives based on this test. Just a massive lack of biochemistry education. This is actually a fantastic PCR test they put together that tests multiple sections of the RdRp along with the E protein. Gold star from my end!
As this topic is likely very confusing to most, I am happy to field questions and can reply when I have time.
Info about directions can be found here
I appreciate the sanity check. I’m glad to see people on PP asking questions about some extraordinary claims and others taking the time to explain them. Such open discussion is far too rare in the world today. And I get to learn something, too!
Right, so it’s a coincidence that CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT exists in human chromosome 8 — a result of using short primer sequences + confusing it as a forward primer when it’s actually a reverse one.
The WHO PCR test is actually the most advanced (more than one RdRp region sequence comparison + E protein comparison), which all countries should adopt to reduce false positives.
Good to know! Thanks Dr. Mayer.
I agree that this is highly coincidental. Not trusting any of the virology science schmience anymore. Germ theory is highly questionable, likely false. Mayer is of course part of the fake virology science program here, either knowingly or unknowingly.
Also, this is RT-PCR, not PCR we are talking about, see Pasteur document. First the reverse transcriptase is working to produce the DNA from the RNA, and then the primer/replication process starts. Does this mean that it would be reversed again into the chromosome 8 sequence?
In any case, great find, brother. Good digging.
Noticed the genome of nOvEl cOrOnA has 33 A’s at the end? 33.