So now that Bitcoin (Notice thaer is no plural as in the first post on the subject in 2018) has dropped in price to $ 3972 (US) and is on the brink of possibly going lower to perhaps the previous low or maybe even down to $2500 (US) is anyone still interested? If you have been involved since 2017 then maybe the 2018 bear market was just too much to stomache?
As the other crypto currencies morph into Stable coins, Exchange offerings and the ICO phase declines from the hype of last year, Bitcoin just marches stuburnly on to become the peoples money. Those thinking of Bitcoin as an investment (in fiat terms) clearly don’t fully understand what unconfiscatable hard money means to the ordinary people who were at the bottom of the cultural pyramid. People are waking up to the Myths!
Not sure how relevant your 2nd paragraph is, or what you were trying to say exactly.
BTC fundamentals aside, for me its a speculative instrument that could again turn into a run away bubble for the masses to jump on.
Granted, South American populations have benefitted from its utility to transmit across borders. IIRC there’s only 4 MM BTC wallets been used even after 10 years since its inception, BTC needs far wider adoption to become widely used in society in the future.
If the manipulation continues and interest rekindles as previously then I’m already watching the signs of accumulation and then rising Price Action months before the next halving approaches.
Interesting you mention $2.5k, I still see that as a possibility with a wick, particulary interested for intra day action to achieve it if we hang around the Weekly 200MA
I’m guessing he’s long. 🙂
I’m guessing he’s long. 🙂
What do you mean by that? Thanks.
long basically means that a person holds the asset either outright or by staking a derivative instrument using leveraged funds (borrowed money) to speculate the price is (at some point) going higher.
the opposite is “short”
Google is able to help
If we continue to somehow push up here (seriously doubt) against higher timeframe hidden bearish divergence & consistently lower weekly vo!ume, up through resistance levels to 4.4k it’s a huge gap in historic price action between 4.6 and 5.7k, we should rip through it before hitting the wall of months of price history at 6k.
I favour we save doing that until later this year unless the whales want to create an almighty bull trap, but I think we are already in one, I’d like to see PA drift back down to the Weekly 200MA at around 3.5k and get some sideways action. Better still we go down to under 3k either with a wick or grinded down by Wyckoff method.
Not wanting to sound too bullish, but if the halving has the same effect as previous cycles I’m growing more confident this bear market AND accumulation ends before Xmas, possibly September…
Certainly not news to many on here…
I quite like this article on Stock to Flow, references gold and it has nice confluence with the NVT Signal ratio too.
Quotes the creator ” As a thought experiment, imagine there was a base metal as scarce as gold but with the following properties: boring grey in colour, not a good conductor of electricity, not particularly strong [..], not useful for any practical or ornamental purpose .. and one special, magical property: can be transported over a communications channel” — Nakamoto ”
DaveF – if your reading, would appreciate your neutral thoughts.
I like the stocks/flows model. It provides a nice theoretical underpinning to a relationship I’ve observed with a lot of commodities.
If scarcity were the only variable in bitcoin’s value calcuation, then it would probably make a rough amount of sense. But notice the S/F dependency for the molecule-items. A gold bar doesn’t depend on a gold mine, or a jeweler to be valuable. If the “gold ecosystem” were to vanish, gold will still have value. Gold has independence from the mechanism of creation, and also in the mechanism of validation.
Contrast with bitcoin. It has a hidden dependency on an operational bitcoin network, which itself has a dependency on an operational, fully connected internet that is “mostly free”, along with a dependency on a reliable electrical grid. Without the network/internet/relative-freedom/electrical grid you cannot effect a transfer or validate possession. Your “digital gold” is useless if you cannot transfer and/or prove ownership.
Lastly, there is the stock/flow situation of “all valuable coins”. While the S/F for bitcoin is hard-coded, others can make ethereum-coin, and the new-new-coin which happens to be even better. If bitcoin itself is superceded by another coin which has more functionality, then the limited amount of capital that wants to be in coins will flow away from bitcoin, regardless of bitcoin’s stock/flow sitution.
So there’s a big fat caveat in owning bitcoin. If just one of those assumptions became problematic – say the “internet” was partitioned between the US and China due to a conflict – then bitcoin would be partitioned too, and the double-spend problem would start to get ugly.
Likewise, if certain powerful nation states (or supra-national organizations) saw bitcoin as a threat, that would make the internet “less free”, and executing bitcoin transactions might become very risky – to freedom, for instance, and would make bitcoin users vulnerable to nation-state monitoring/hacking attempts.
If another coin comes along and looks better, bitcoin’s share of the aggregate coin S/F space gets worse.
Not saying the world will end in fire, but – bitcoin isn’t gold. Bitcoin stands at the apex of a large amount of complicated technology, which itself depends on everything continuing to work more or less exactly how it currently works. And those assumptions are built into the S/F price calculation.
And that’s not true with gold.