Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   61 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 61 total)
  • Tue, Apr 13, 2021 - 11:48am

    #12
    sand_kitty

    sand_kitty

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Apr 13 2011

    Posts: 2007

    count placeholder11

    Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

Loved this article.  Addresses the underlying issue of “is it permissible to think critically about this disease and its treatment?”

 

  • Tue, Apr 13, 2021 - 12:02pm

    #13
    Mike from Jersey

    Mike from Jersey

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 22 2018

    Posts: 1439

    count placeholder12

    Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

Along those lines. This is from a professor at the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU:

Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralizing antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.  (Emphasis supplied)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/

Since it takes time for Antibody Dependent Enhancement to occur, the same thing could be said of the current push on vaccines. It is all being done with a total lack of informed consent.

  • Tue, Apr 13, 2021 - 02:37pm   (Reply to #6)

    #14
    Cribbage

    Cribbage

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 06 2020

    Posts: 21

    count placeholder4

    Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

@davefairtex

Always appreciate your posts, so here’s one for you!

https://thehighwire.com/videos/a-potential-danger-of-covid-vaccines-part-1/

https://thehighwire.com/a-potential-danger-of-covid-vaccines-part-2/

Lesley

  • Wed, Apr 14, 2021 - 09:30am

    #15
    Blueberry

    Blueberry

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 07 2013

    Posts: 52

    count placeholder3

    Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

Geert Vanden Bossche put out a new video today. Plenty of info on his site against getting the vaccine.

https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/

 

  • Wed, Apr 14, 2021 - 08:27pm

    #16
    DaveDD

    DaveDD

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 08 2019

    Posts: 599

    count placeholder6

    Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

Hi All,

Indeed.

I’m not sure if this was already posted, but I would urge everyone to watch the videos on this site (link). This researcher is imo the real deal. Main takeaways:

– SARS COV2 is manmade

– it exhibits certain HIV traits

– but there are effective treatment regimes (we all know them by now)

– the mRNA vaccine does alter your DNA, this is not a hypothesis anymore, neither fake news. Keep in mind, the mRNA of an artificial spike protein…

– blood clothing, brain damage etc are all inline with well-know mechanisms

– ADE is “built” in the (artificial) spike protein

– worst case, other detrimental symptoms induced by these vaccines could occur a year, year and a half from now (speculative)

– people who are vaccinated: there is reason to believe that the treatment regimes will also work when you are confronted with adverse effects later  on

On a personal note: I think that five to 10 years from now, there will be international tribunals. Untill that time, open resistance is futile imo: how to stop a stampede? Don’t, get out of the way; our society is currently in a mass psychosis like Germany was 75 years ago. Families are split, friends could be lost. Unless of course we find the wisdom in our hearts to accept that even loved ones are temporarily stuck in their own believe system; they might need our support them later on. On the other hand, there are always safe havens, good people, useful information, and ethical decisions to be made. All, take care, and do not be afraid: we all have been here before…

grts, Dave

  • Wed, Apr 14, 2021 - 08:59pm

    #17

    Quercus bicolor

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 19 2008

    Posts: 1085

    count placeholder3

    Finding adverse events – interviewing doctors

That letter from BC points in an interesting direction.

I suggest we gather assessments from primary care doctors and others who see many patients regarding any changes they’ve seen in patients coming to them with neurological, blood, lung and other issues since the vaccine rollout.

I will add two stories here.  In supporting my wife in getting medical care in recent weeks, there have been exactly two other patients whom have either shared with me or spoken in a way that I learned the reason they were seeking care.

  1. Woman in her seventies given a bed in the same room as my wife.  Her symptom is shaking to the point where her voice wavers.  The onset of this likely neurological symptom is sometime in the past few days or perhaps a week.  During their conversation, her husband mentions how they both received their second dose a few weeks ago.
  2. In a PC doctor’s waiting room during their lunch break.  I speak with a woman in her fifties who has had trouble lifting her arms (both not just one) above 90° for days.  She is concerned it is a vaccine side effect.  The fact that this is both arms is telling, suggesting it is not a shoulder issue, although it could possibly be a neck issue.  Of course the other possibility is a neurological problem.

To repeat, I had no other encounters where I learned any information about someone’s medical situation, only these two.

  • Wed, Apr 14, 2021 - 09:57pm

    #18
    Mots

    Mots

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 18 2012

    Posts: 532

    count placeholder6

    Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

The biggest unknown in the chemical story is is the ability or not of injected RNA to change DNA by integrating into nuclear DNA (via reverse transcriptase enzyme) and adding random sequences, which can cause health havoc.

Here are two references that discuss the existence of natural “endogenous” reverse transcriptase, the enzyme that replicates RNA into DNA:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8472211_Endogenous_Reverse_Transcriptase_A_mediator_of_cell_proliferation_and_differentiation

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201216/SARS-CoV-2-RNA-can-be-reverse-transcribed-to-be-part-of-chimeric-viral-human-genome.aspx

From surveying several articles, my impression is that endogenous reverse transcriptase (which generally is needed to allow injected RNA to change DNA) is of two types: 1. from retro viruses which introduce their own form of this enzyme when they infect cells, and 2. autonomous retrotransposons which are naturally present and which can do this.  Bear in mind that a basic principle is that anything and everything can be found reaction-wise at a miniscule level, problems occur when a large amount of something weird is stuck into a tuned system (weird trans fats in high amounts, high amounts of arsenic or selenium which overpower normal operation of phosphorus and sulfur metabolism systems respectively, etc. come to mind here.

There are many different types of RNA, which do a lot of freaky things inside a cell.  Even if an alternative pathway is not expected for the injected mRNA, introducing massive amounts of anything can cause unexpected reactions because equilibriums are disturbed.  Also, is this really mRNA?  I suppose that modifications were made to stabilize it etc. etc. and that is why the industry needs years of study and was not allowed to inject this stuff before.  All the weird shit done to get the mRNA into cells by chemical alteration or packaging (not at all natural) itself are factors that should and will cause unexpected results.  The experts have not studied this nearly enough.

If this were a modern plague and >25% will definitely die, I would understand not getting FDA approval.  I like sand_puppy`s notion of preparing ones body well, lining up the intervention system and then getting the virus, while relying on the evolved defenses to do their work, which they do 99.9% of of the time if they are not age-feebled.

  • Thu, Apr 15, 2021 - 05:57am

    #19
    Simon & Aliza

    Simon & Aliza

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 04 2020

    Posts: 21

    count placeholder12

    Report from a free thinking ER nurse friend

Got this via text this morning from a nurse friend/goat farmer. She works in the ER of a small rural hospital here in Maine. She gave me permission to repost with her name removed. She reports seeing a significant number of ER patients with very likely vaccine-related issues that never get reported as vaccine events.

 

What do you know…yesterday had a healthy 50 yo male patient with no hx of clotting disorders or family hx of strokes come in with ischemic stroke after receiving none other than the J&J jab a few days ago. You think the doctors gave two shits about that fact? Or the facts that he was not obese, a non smoker, only occasional drinker yet somehow had a full-on, face drooping, losing control of his left arm stroke? They fucking refuse to connect the dots. They literally said ‘I don’t care what caused the stroke, we are just going to treat it’s. Well, duh. Of course we are going to treat this stroke, but isn’t it your due diligence and within your hippocratic oath as an MD to report this?! Even if it wasn’t caused solely by the vax, you can’t tell me that it was just a coincidence and let it slide. They literally made no mention of the patient having received the vax in their doc to doc report or anything. And of course gave me attitude when I questioned them. “A”, reporting the facts to those who care!! Lol.

  • Thu, Apr 15, 2021 - 06:05am

    #20
    Simon & Aliza

    Simon & Aliza

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 04 2020

    Posts: 21

    count placeholder5

    ER nurse friend also said, at least in her ER…

Second text from the ER nurse/goat farmer….

 

Also, feel free to spread this. Even when a patient comes in with a positive test result (((I’m talking, literally coming from the docs office where they tested her to the ER))) they make us re-test ‘just to be sure’. How bout that for inflation of case numbers? I think perhaps if you’re REALLY suspicious of a test being wrong, it would more so be a false negative you’d be concerned about. But a false positive? Sounds like an easy 2 for 1 deal on upping those positive case numbers to me. I highly doubt the cdc takes multiple tests on the same patient into account, I think they just count positive results. I could be wrong but I doubt it.

  • Thu, Apr 15, 2021 - 06:48am

    #21
    dreinmund

    dreinmund

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 19 2011

    Posts: 345

    count placeholder2

    Best Article I Have Seen on Vaccine – Please Read

Wow, that double testing and reporting is nuts.

We all need to stop trusting numbers we haven’t fudged ourselves.

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 61 total)

Login or Register to post comments