A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   524 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 524 total)
  • Mon, Mar 15, 2021 - 08:01pm

    #11
    debu

    debu

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 16 2009

    Posts: 102

    count placeholder3

    Another presentation by

…Dr. Bridle who is an associate professor from the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph is a good complement to the one by Bossche, confirming some of his points and adding additional potential concerns.

Deliberately mangled link: bit…e dot com/video/BOo7u898FXg1/

“I WOULD PROBABLY PREFER TO HAVE NATURAL IMMUNITY” — DR BYRAM BRIDLE (VIRAL IMMUNOLOGIST) bit chute

  • Mon, Mar 15, 2021 - 08:16pm

    #12
    Disco Bear

    Disco Bear

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 48

    count placeholder7

    A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

Dr. Bossche doesn’t use the term mRNA vaccines (which is short for messenger RNA).  He uses the term “prophylactic vaccines.”

The new Johnson & Johnson vaccine is not an mRNA vaccine, but it does fall under the more general heading of “prophylactic vaccine.”

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/27/health/johnson-johnson-coronavirus-vaccine-explainer/index.html

The Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses viral vector technology. A common cold virus called adenovirus 26 is genetically engineered so that it can infect cells, but it won’t replicate there. It cannot spread in the body, and won’t give people a cold. Like the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, it delivers genetic instructions.

Instead of being carried in little lipid balls, the genetic instructions are injected by the weakened virus into arm cells, and they make the pieces that look like part of the coronavirus spike protein — the knob-shaped structure that the virus uses to connect to cells.

All of these vaccines suffer from the same defect: they target the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.  Once that virus mutates enough, it will be able to evade the antibodies created by the vaccines, rendering the vaccination useless with the added defect that the body’s innate natural immunity supplied by the natural killer cells has been supressed.  The body will be left totally defenseless.

  • Mon, Mar 15, 2021 - 08:47pm

    #13
    AndrewOregon

    AndrewOregon

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 93

    count placeholder2

    A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

Hi All,

Here is Drbeen’s refutation of some of the core material in the Bossche video.

Been’s main concepts:

You can’t create the antibodies, from the vaccine, without activating the innate arm of the immune system.

The presence of antibodies, created from the vaccine process, will not in any way hinder the innate immune system when a new variant arrives.

Tears it apart pretty well, but I am not a scientist!! Curious to hear others, and maybe Drbeen is missing something.

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1BdxYYWAqODxX

  • Mon, Mar 15, 2021 - 09:17pm

    #14

    Jim H

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1440

    count placeholder1

    A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

Another voice alerting us to the vaccine’s dangers;

https://www.brighteon.com/0df28628-3b9b-42a3-a4c9-5bec480e8335

  • Tue, Mar 16, 2021 - 01:30am   (Reply to #5)

    #15
    Peggy

    Peggy

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 29 2020

    Posts: 94

    count placeholder4

    A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

“Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Explains How the Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start Working in 3-6 Months – Forbidden Knowledge TV”

 

Yeah. She could be wrong. What will she do if she is? Bump it back another year? 12-18 mos? And then… 24-30 mos?

I agree there could be some nasty stuff coming down the pike with the vaccines, but this is a little hysterical.

  • Tue, Mar 16, 2021 - 03:08am

    #16
    David McKenney

    David McKenney

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 25 2020

    Posts: 105

    count placeholder2

    A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

Has no one read the 5 page letter that Dr. Bossche sent to WHO? The last page states that vaccinations are the answer: a “good vaccine”, produced by guess who: him and Big Pharma.

So, once the majority of the population is eliminated, the remaining anti-vaxers will be “persuaded” to get the “good vaccine”. (Is it already made?) What do you suppose will be added to the “good vaccine”? The Great Reset is complete!

Why no mention of treatments like ivermectin?

Why is he not being censored?  Red flags.

Just some thoughts.

Here is the open letter to WHO:

https://dryburgh.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Geert_Vanden_Bossche_Open_Letter_WHO_March_6_2021.pdf

  • Tue, Mar 16, 2021 - 07:44am

    #17
    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 621

    count placeholder5

    A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

No matter what hypothesis one wants to buy into, there is no escaping the fact that these are experimental vaccines that have never before been used on humans, and were unsuccessful in animal testing. Those who are taking/going to take the jab are, knowingly or not, participating in a ‘live’ human experiment. I personally do not wish to be a guinea pig for big pharma and the billionaire elites… you go first and I will watch closely to see how this plays out. Good luck!

There are many reasons I can think of for why this is all happening. Consider this:

https://canadianpatriot.org/2021/03/14/nazi-healthcare-revived-across-the-five-eyes-a-eugenic-solution-for-the-baby-boomer-time-bomb/

An excerpt:

… By 2030, it is currently estimated people over the age of 85 will triple while seniors between 65-85 will double. The financial costs of sustaining this demographic will skyrocket as healthcare services double from their currently massive $1.4 trillion/year to $3 trillion/year by 2050 (in the USA).

As cost-effectiveness experts look at this dismal trend, all they can see is a cold numbers game.

When thinking about our old people, these experts don’t tend to see humans with cognitive powers, souls or intrinsic value and they certainly don’t recognize the existence of such immaterial notions as the “sacred” which might prevent the culling of lives in order to satisfy monetary constraints.

They certainly don’t recognize the injustices of a system that allows trillions of dollars to be spent for Wall Street bailouts and Middle East wars but which fails to provide the medical resources to service its own population fairly. The experts I am talking about who once ruled America under Barack Obama and who have resurged into power under Biden only see the cold fact that 80% or more of the healthcare costs absorbed throughout one’s life occur after 65 years of age. These experts can only think in terms of adapting to scarcity and supposedly “fixed limits” but never eliminating scarcity through systemic changes that place human life and creative thought on a higher priority than mere money.

With ever fewer young people entering the work force (and with the financial system itself set to meltdown under hyperinflation), two options present themselves:

1)     Recognize that the system is broken and transform it in such a way that national spending priorities are re-directed towards large-scale, long term infrastructure building and cooperation with other nations among the multipolar alliance

OR

2)     Work within the rules of the broken system and cull the human herd to diminish costs associated with “scarce medical resources”. …

Anyone see evidence of #1 being the chosen option?

 

  • Tue, Mar 16, 2021 - 09:01am

    #18

    Jim H

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1440

    count placeholder2

    Denninger weighs in…

Ever the colorful writer, angry at the stupidity of the sheeple;

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=241779

………..Simply put when you place imperfectly matched evolutionary pressure on a pathological agent you risk horrifyingly bad results. That’s what we’ve learned over time. This is why we have MRSA and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. It is why we have C.Diff. It is why in animal husbandry we have potentiated horrifyingly bad infectious diseases in factory farming and thus instead of killing 5 or 10% of an infected group of animals we now must cull them all because they will all die; an effective 100% kill rate, as a direct and proximate outcome from placing imperfect immune pressure on said diseases rather than letting natural immunity be the source of protection.

We are doing the same ******ned thing now with Covid-19 and these “vaccines” along with trying to prevent young and healthy people from getting the infection naturally and if we get what we deserve those who were stupid enough to take the shot are likely to get pounded with the “new and exciting strains” in the months and years ahead and die as a direct consequence while quite-possibly killing their neighbors at the same time.

Maybe that won’t happen — and we’ll get lucky this time.

But if it does happen then there will not be a damned thing you can do about it if you took the jab — and quite-possibly even if you didn’t! In other words if this risk becomes realized your fatal error was allowing this experiment to be run on the human population in the first place. And no, it is not possible to out-vaccinate viral mutation; the typical viral “turn time” during which a mutation can take place is around 10 hours and the infectious generation time for Covid-19 approximately four to five days. How long does it take you to recognize, reformate and re-jab everyone again? Worse, each time you try that if the virus evades it you potentiate even more-virulent mutations!

If I’m right this time around I hope you don’t expect any form of mercy when those wildly more-virulent strains, an event that ordinary natural selection does not allow to become material until and unless you tamper with natural immunity show up.

You damn sure won’t deserve it.

  • Tue, Mar 16, 2021 - 09:27am

    #19

    jturbo68

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 04 2009

    Posts: 269

    count placeholder1

    Reply To: A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

 

What if the  reality is closer to the following.

Yes there are risks to vaccinations.  However, it is what we have deployed at the moment.

A worldwide pandemic  allowed to roam relatively freely in a global population, with millions infected at any given time, accumulating virus mutations and variants so that we never catch up, leading to yearly waves of a pandemic and yearly vaccines.   I doubt that C19 is fully embedded in the global population yet.

I suspect that we have a relatively short window to eradicate the virus on a worldwide basis.   We currently have highly effective vaccines and  probably IVM as well.   Unless we get cracking on a global solution, I am guessing the rate of mutation in a continued  large infected population will outpace out ability to tweak the solutions and reach a permanent solution.

 

  • Tue, Mar 16, 2021 - 12:16pm

    #20
    Kat43

    Kat43

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 10 2020

    Posts: 446

    count placeholder1

    Reply To: A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche

As AndrewOregon mentioned above, Dr. Been does not agree with Dr. Bossche’s interpretations. He calls Bossche’s arguments frustrating, contradictory, and circular. He discusses on his Twitter Open Forums of March 12 and 13. Has anyone else looked at them? It’s all above my head, but these are two individuals I highly respect.

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 524 total)

Login or Register to post comments