9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

Login or register to post comments Last Post 4299 reads   171 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 161 through 170 (of 171 total)
  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 11:28am

    #161
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

By the way, Lloyd (the cab driver) his wife works for the FBI.  If you watch the full video you will see how he sticks to his story till the end even when there are pictures of him on the bridge. 

It’s amazing, I have been showing friends of mine all the evidence of 9/11 and there is always a point where every single one of them see that we were had. 

I may not know the truth but I know when I’m being lied to and the lies never end.

Why can’t people get it??

  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 12:50pm

    #162
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

Ok, but… so if the plane actually DID hit the pentagon…

What about the theory that the hole was the wrong size for a plane that still had wings attached?  That one gets me, every time.  The measurements of the plane are wider than the hole… how’s that work?

AND if a plane actually DID hit the pentagon, why did they feel the need to FAKE knocking down light poles?  I mean, it’d be obvious – there’d be wreckage and whatever. 

And if the plane did NOT hit, then where are the passangers that purportedly were on the plane that was supposed to hit?

there’s weirdness surrounding the crash that happened in PA, too…

 

  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 01:31pm

    #163
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

Jenna,

I agree that a plane did not hit the pentagon and IMO it was a missle.  There are eyewitness reports saying there a plane flew over at low altitude but never hit the building.

That’s a great question, where are the passengers?  Also, did you know that the alleged phone calls from Barbara Olsen who was on flight 77 have been proven that they never happened  by the FBI.

Anyway here is a good short video about the pentagon on 911

Like I said to Larry, I may not know the truth, but I know when Im being lied to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su1bfG4J3TM 

  • Sun, May 31, 2009 - 11:33am

    #164
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    WTC Collapse Discussed in Interview with Architect

 

A concise (7 minute interview with an architect) synopsis of the issues with the official story of the WTC building collapses:

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/richard-gage-on-ca-fox-station-discussing-911-evidence-for-controlled-demolition/4075017746

 

 

  • Sun, May 31, 2009 - 09:31pm

    #165
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

[quote=c1oudfire]

[quote=Zombie210]

This thread should be moved to the controversial topics subforum imo.

[/quote]

[quote=Aaron Moyer]Can we please move past these truther type threads, and get back to the point of CM.com?[/quote]

 

Yup, this is CM’s site.  He has a right to make it anything he wants it to be.  But if speculation and free inquiry are to be suppressed, and relegated to some catacomb at the bottom of the Forums page, I’ll take that to be a clear indication that this site is henceforth to be relegated to my "sometimes useful" list, not the central locus it now occupies. 

[/quote]

CM is a truther, far as I know. I could be wrong.

 

  • Sun, May 31, 2009 - 09:35pm

    #166
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

[quote=BSV]

All:

Given the passion that is evident in these posts, I am starting to worry about the long term viability of the Martenson website. I fear that we will all be marginalized, relegated to nutcase status in the court of popular opinion. It shocked me that Chris Martenson weighed in on the 9/11 "conspiracy" theory. Though his post was eminently reasonable and written from the perspective of someone with a real science background, my reaction was concern and alarm. I’m worried. I think he should have been slower to tread this minefield.

This community has a lot of positive potential. Lots of people can be helped by the information that our community posts on a daily basis. We must all be cautious about what we post. Just take a look at the "who’s online" numbers versus the guests. The latter generally outnumber the former by a substantial margin. I cannot help but worry, because I want this movement of ours to succeed. I can visualize it becoming a statistical outlier if we are not careful. Please moderate your posts in the interest of the greater good of our our community.

If you want to flame me for this post, go right ahead. But I have only respect and affection for the other members of our community. I love you all.

Barry

[/quote]

Could someone please direct me towards Chris’s comments on 911. I’m interested to hear what he has to say.

  • Sun, May 31, 2009 - 09:39pm

    #167
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

[quote=agitating prop]

[quote=BSV]

All:

Given the passion that is evident in these posts, I am starting to worry about the long term viability of the Martenson website. I fear that we will all be marginalized, relegated to nutcase status in the court of popular opinion. It shocked me that Chris Martenson weighed in on the 9/11 "conspiracy" theory. Though his post was eminently reasonable and written from the perspective of someone with a real science background, my reaction was concern and alarm. I’m worried. I think he should have been slower to tread this minefield.

This community has a lot of positive potential. Lots of people can be helped by the information that our community posts on a daily basis. We must all be cautious about what we post. Just take a look at the "who’s online" numbers versus the guests. The latter generally outnumber the former by a substantial margin. I cannot help but worry, because I want this movement of ours to succeed. I can visualize it becoming a statistical outlier if we are not careful. Please moderate your posts in the interest of the greater good of our our community.

If you want to flame me for this post, go right ahead. But I have only respect and affection for the other members of our community. I love you all.

Barry

[/quote]

Could someone please direct me towards Chris’s comments on 911. I’m interested to hear what he has to say.

[/quote]

Ooops–found it.

  • Sun, Jun 14, 2009 - 08:40am

    #168
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

Yuk!

  • Mon, Jun 15, 2009 - 07:19am

    #169
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

The organization and website started by architect Richard Gage, featured in a video posted previously by c1oudfire:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

  • Thu, Jul 02, 2009 - 12:02am

    #170
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder0

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/25865/US_Major_General__911_was_a_fraud/

Viewing 10 posts - 161 through 170 (of 171 total)

Login or Register to post comments