9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

Login or register to post comments Last Post 4492 reads   171 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 151 through 160 (of 171 total)
  • Thu, May 07, 2009 - 01:38am

    #151
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

"911 press for truth" to be shown on american mainstream tv ….. finally !

I am very happy to announce that for the first time in our movements history, 9-11 Press for Truth will be shown on a mainstream media television station. KBDI Channel 12 in Denver Colorado has just confirmed that they will be showing this groundbreaking film during their upcoming pledge drive on June 3, 2009.

As many of you may know, this is not the first time that Colorado 9-11 Visibility has made an appearance on KBDI. Our most recent appearance was in March of this year during the showing of America, Freedom to Fascism.

The trailer – 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYEMu48apIA

The Full Video 1:24 hours but worth it

My quick Comments

Larry

  • Thu, May 07, 2009 - 03:16am

    #152
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

[quote=Worker Bee]

I just don’t get it.

There is a very high probability that 9/11 was an inside job, or at the very least, carried out with the help of foreign governments and covered up by our elements in our own government.

Why wouldn’t every citizen be concerned about this?  There really seems to be more going on behind the scenes than anyone would care to admit.

When I first started to read about the 9/11 events in 2006 I was doing so from the perspective of a gung-ho "get all those damn A-rabs" point of view.  But the more I read about the event the more my beliefs were shattered.  When I would talk to people about what I was reading and learning I would get the eye-rolls and soon figured out no one wanted to hear it. 

Whoever did this won, their propaganda machine works.  Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Like Dogs said, "what are you going to do about it?"  Build a garden and bury your head in the sand.  Just make sure you lay low and stay out of the way.  I guess if I had a government pension and health benefits I would feel the same way.  Don’t rock the boat.

What are you going to do about it?  Obviously nothing when you have a citizenry of idiots with that kind of attitude.

To controversial to try to discuss, the bullies win.

Goodbye CM, good luck with your website.

[/quote]

Worker Bee,

My recommendation is to not leave CM; but to come here for the purpose for which it was intended to serve. That focus, of course, was on the 3Es. Their exist other concerns, of course, and 9/11 may be one of them, but I personally don’t think that Chris Martenson foresaw those particular areas of interest on his site.

And, after all, this is his site, not ours. What you may perceive to be bullying (and, sometimes, I admit, it can certainly seem that way), may be simply the efforts of others to refocus attention on the purpose of this site. Chris Martenson started this site to promote the Crash Course, and the idea of the 3Es, not as a forum for discussion of "controversial subjects", no matter how important those subjects may be.

Personally, I hope you will remain, as I believe you have made some very good comments that are worthy of reflection.

For what its worth…

  • Thu, May 07, 2009 - 02:53pm

    #153
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

[quote=ccpetersmd]

[quote=Worker Bee]

I just don’t get it.

There is a very high probability that 9/11 was an inside job, or at the very least, carried out with the help of foreign governments and covered up by our elements in our own government.

Why wouldn’t every citizen be concerned about this?  There really seems to be more going on behind the scenes than anyone would care to admit.

When I first started to read about the 9/11 events in 2006 I was doing so from the perspective of a gung-ho "get all those damn A-rabs" point of view.  But the more I read about the event the more my beliefs were shattered.  When I would talk to people about what I was reading and learning I would get the eye-rolls and soon figured out no one wanted to hear it. 

Whoever did this won, their propaganda machine works.  Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Like Dogs said, "what are you going to do about it?"  Build a garden and bury your head in the sand.  Just make sure you lay low and stay out of the way.  I guess if I had a government pension and health benefits I would feel the same way.  Don’t rock the boat.

What are you going to do about it?  Obviously nothing when you have a citizenry of idiots with that kind of attitude.

To controversial to try to discuss, the bullies win.

Goodbye CM, good luck with your website.

[/quote]

Worker Bee,

My recommendation is to not leave CM; but to come here for the purpose for which it was intended to serve. That focus, of course, was on the 3Es. Their exist other concerns, of course, and 9/11 may be one of them, but I personally don’t think that Chris Martenson foresaw those particular areas of interest on his site.

And, after all, this is his site, not ours. What you may perceive to be bullying (and, sometimes, I admit, it can certainly seem that way), may be simply the efforts of others to refocus attention on the purpose of this site. Chris Martenson started this site to promote the Crash Course, and the idea of the 3Es, not as a forum for discussion of "controversial subjects", no matter how important those subjects may be.

Personally, I hope you will remain, as I believe you have made some very good comments that are worthy of reflection.

For what its worth…

[/quote]

i agree.  It may well be important to talk about it, and CM was trying to allow for that, but considering we can’t seem to discuss something without getting into bickering about how other people are posting, I guess it seems reasonable to me for it to be moved elsewhere.  In most forums I frequent this thread would have been locked and deleted (before it got nearly to a full first page) or otherwise heavily moderated.  Not because of the "conspiracy theories" necessarily – although there likely would have been some because of that – but because people were name-calling.  *shrug*  At least he left it intact (as far as I know) and put it somewhere were it was ok for the discussion to continue as it was going. 

There’s a time and a place for everything, I guess? 

 

  • Thu, May 07, 2009 - 05:00pm

    #154
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

Worker Bee aka "dot" said:

…Why wouldn’t every citizen be concerned about this?  There really seems to be more going on behind the scenes than anyone would care to admit.

When I first started to read about the 9/11 events in 2006 I was doing so from the perspective of a gung-ho "get all those damn A-rabs" point of view.  But the more I read about the event the more my beliefs were shattered.  When I would talk to people about what I was reading and learning I would get the eye-rolls and soon figured out no one wanted to hear it. 

Whoever did this won, their propaganda machine works.  Nothing to see here folks, move along.

Like Dogs said, "what are you going to do about it?"  Build a garden and bury your head in the sand.  Just make sure you lay low and stay out of the way.  I guess if I had a government pension and health benefits I would feel the same way.  Don’t rock the boat.

What are you going to do about it?  Obviously nothing when you have a citizenry of idiots with that kind of attitude.

To controversial to try to discuss, the bullies win.

Goodbye CM, good luck with your website.

Don’t leave – we need you! 

  • Thu, May 07, 2009 - 09:05pm

    #155
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Pentagon Attack, Cab Driver, Lloyde England’s Virtual Confession

Okay, this just adds more serious questions.  I hope this guy doesn’t get suicided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho

  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 12:48am

    #156
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: Pentagon Attack, Cab Driver, Lloyde England’s Virtual …

[quote=castlewp]

Okay, this just adds more serious questions.  I hope this guy doesn’t get suicided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho

[/quote]

wha?  wait…. I’m missing something.  What’s the north side approach thing?  I mean he clearly said there was a conspiracy, but I’m not getting what his part in it was…

  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 01:46am

    #157
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: Pentagon Attack, Cab Driver, Lloyde England’s Virtual …

where he was in comparison to the path of the plane was way off.  Now he is trying to change his story and saying that he wasn’t where the photographs of him showed. And boy he is sticking to his guns even though he makes no sense  The point of this is that it seems that the whole taxi cab scene was staged to show that a light pole went through his windshield, when if fact the planes path was no where near him.  You may want to watch the full length version.

Sorry if what I just wrote didn’t make any sense

  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 01:52am

    #158
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: Pentagon Attack, Cab Driver, Lloyde England’s Virtual …

Yeah, no, I got that.  I’m just wondering what they thought ACTUALLY happened…

  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 02:01am

    #159
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: Pentagon Attack, Cab Driver, Lloyde England’s Virtual …

They being, the makers of the video?

  • Fri, May 08, 2009 - 03:36am

    #160
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1613

    count placeholder

    Re: 9/11 WTC explosives – not a conspiracy theory

castlewp said: 

Okay, this just adds more serious questions.  I hope this guy doesn’t get suicided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho

Thanks for the video – first time view for me.  The cab driver interview (if legit) corroborates the flight data recorder, according to the Pilots for 911 Truth.  

The Pilots for 911 Truth state that (Link) "The NTSB provided an animation of the entire flight from taxi out at Dulles… to the impact at the Pentagon in real time…We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircraft to have struck down the light poles."

This altitude has been determined to reflect Pressure altitude as set by 29.92 inHg on the Altimeter. The actual local pressure for DCA at impact time was 30.22 inHg. The error for this discrepancy is 300 feet. Meaning, the actual aircraft altitude was 300 feet higher than indicated at that moment in time. Which means aircraft altitude was 480 feet above sea level (MSL, 75 foot margin for error according to Federal Aviation Regulations).

Larry

Viewing 10 posts - 151 through 160 (of 171 total)

Login or Register to post comments