• Blog

    Fauci Lied, People Died (Part 1 Public)

    Fauci Lab-Leak Coverup Revealed via Emails
    by Whitney

    Friday, June 4, 2021, 8:21 PM

Video





Audio

In this episode, I break down a very short window of time from Jan 31, 2020 to Feb 2 – 2020 when Fauci met with key representatives of the Wellcome Trust, WHO, NIH and senior private virologists.  They presumably discussed prior and ongoing gain of function experiments on SARS CoV viruses as well as the lab leak origin theory that was worriedly gaining steam out in the public eye.
Mere days after this meeting a wall of scientific opinion coupled to air-tight media backing concluded that SARS-CoV-2 could not have come from a lab but must​ have been of natural origin.
We now know this was not based on science but was a predetermined conclusion in search of supporters and which made declarative statements that could not possibly have been grounded in actual science.
Links:

#007 Fauci Emails and Lab Leak Timeline 

 

Science Mag “strongly condemns”

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/scientists-strongly-condemn-rumors-and-conspiracy-theories-about-origin-coronavirus

Lancet Financing of International Efforts

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(17)30203-6/fulltext#%20

Lancet “Statement in Support of China”

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9/fulltext#%20

Nature – “Proximal Origin”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9#article-info

Nature – Baric, Shi SARS GoF Experiments

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985#accession-codes

US Gain of Function moratorium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain_of_function_research

Virological “Proximal Origin” paper uploaded Feb 9

https://virological.org/t/the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2/398

FOIA – Fauci emails

Related content
» More

33 Comments

  • Fri, Jun 04, 2021 - 8:57pm

    #1
    avit

    avit

    Status: Member

    Joined: Feb 21 2010

    Posts: 11

    1

    avit said:

    Hi Dr. Chris, super interesting run-through and context for this email thread today.

    You focused so strongly on the gray boxes and the b.5 exemptions that I think you missed mentioning something glaringly obvious:

    What was the attachment called on the first teleconference email where Dr. Fauci says "Kristen and Eddie have shared this and will talk through it on the call"? (28:00)

    I assume "Kristen" is Kristian. Could the file name there tell us anything about what's in the gray boxes?

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Fri, Jun 04, 2021 - 9:32pm

    #2
    coh

    coh

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 123

    7

    coh said:

    Kristian Andersen is one of the virologists who will block anyone (on twitter) who says anything even remotely supporting the possibility of a lab leak. Guess how I know?

    They don't want anyone peaking behind the curtain. Wonder why...

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Fri, Jun 04, 2021 - 9:58pm

    #3
    RightLight

    RightLight

    Status: Member

    Joined: Jun 05 2021

    Posts: 1

    7

    "we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus...we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo."

    A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence (nih.gov)

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Fri, Jun 04, 2021 - 11:35pm

    #4
    Joy 2e

    Joy 2e

    Status: Member

    Joined: Dec 18 2020

    Posts: 1

    6

    FLPD (Part 1)

    At marker 27:13 in the video, the one guy asks to be notified if they decide to "prevaricate" so he can go forward with it.

    What an atrocity!

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 9:22am

    #5
    MercyRule

    MercyRule

    Status: Member

    Joined: Apr 04 2020

    Posts: 1

    4

    2014 GOF funding was paused- link

    For reference, here's a link to the October 2014 US Government pause on GOF research funding;

    http://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/gain-of-function.pdf

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 2:53pm

    #6
    Jinga

    Jinga

    Status: Member

    Joined: Jun 05 2021

    Posts: 4

    5

    Hey Chris - thanks for the great analysis. One additional point you may not know re Drosten

    Around min 6 you show and email with Drosten cc'd. I believe he is the scientist who developed the covid PCR test for the WHO and rushed it to approval based on a flawed study that was "peer-reviewed' in a couple of days in Jan2020. And later challenged widely as unscientific and conflicted financially.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 3:22pm

    #7
    Jinga

    Jinga

    Status: Member

    Joined: Jun 05 2021

    Posts: 4

    0

    Christian Drosten's rushed, conlicted, shoddy study used to push the test thru WHO approval. Scientific backlash...

    Public health journal “seeking further expert advice” on January paper about COVID-19 PCR testing by high-profile virologist

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 7:19pm

    #8
    AndrewOregon

    AndrewOregon

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 91

    3

    More on codes used for redaction, discussion

    and the mysterious Huff.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 7:23pm

    #9
    AndrewOregon

    AndrewOregon

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 91

    0

    More on Drosten, drug boy

    And Nass' take on the great windfall Covid has created to experiment with lots of drugs on hapless, fearful people, with free money from foundations and governments.

    https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/06/christian-drosten-germanys-dr-fauci.html

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 7:41pm

    #10
    AndrewOregon

    AndrewOregon

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 91

    6

    Chris, more on J Ferrar

    Nass and Kennedy in interview 30 minutes. Brilliant humanitarians.

    Smoking gun letter with Fauci implicated as one of the secret authors on Lancet Letter debunking lab theory. And Jeremy Farrar background including the high dose hydroxy trials killing people.

    https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/rfk-jr-the-defender-podcast-robert-kennedy-jr-nNwcHQI43x-/

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 8:03pm

    #11
    AndrewOregon

    AndrewOregon

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 91

    0

    Nass' names more background on co-conspirators, watch her work

    https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/06/chris-martenson-has-more-emails-that.html

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 05, 2021 - 8:13pm

    #12
    Andy in the Sun

    Andy in the Sun

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: May 28 2021

    Posts: 34

    9

    The German Media is doubling down

    Currently there is NO mentioning of Faucigate in the German media... even R. Paul's "inquisition" of Fauchi is already a handful of days in the past. But suddenly other articles appear...

    Translation by Google

    Drosten has a clear opinion on the origin of the corona virus

    The Berlin virologist Christian Drosten sees the path via the fur industry as the most plausible among the various hypotheses on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. "I have no evidence for this, except for the clearly proven origin of SARS-1, and this is a virus of the same species. Viruses of the same species do the same things and often have the same origin," Drosten told the Swiss online magazine "Republic".

    In 2002 and 2003, a wave of infections emanating from China resulted in around 800 deaths worldwide. The condition has been called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The pathogen SARS-CoV-2, which was detected for the first time at the end of 2019, is very closely related to the virus of the time.

    With the first SARS virus, the transitional hosts were raccoon dogs and crawling cats, said Drosten. "That is assured." In China, raccoon dogs were still used extensively in the fur industry. Wild raccoon dogs that may have previously eaten bats - which are considered the most likely origin of SARS-CoV-2 - are repeatedly brought into the breeding farms.

    Transmission from animals to humans through aerosols 

    "Raccoon dogs and crawling cats are lively pulled over their ears," explained the Charité virologist. They emit death screams and roar, whereas aerosols are created in the process. Humans can then become infected with the virus. "For him it was surprising that this breeding would even be considered as a possible starting point for a pandemic - until recently he lived "in the naive idea" that crawling cats and raccoon dogs, as known potential transitional hosts, are now being controlled. "For me it was a closed story. I thought that this kind of pet trade had been stopped and that it would never come back. And now Sars has come back."There are no concrete indications that the transition to humans took place via fur farms - there are no studies in this area at all, at least none have become public. It is therefore completely unclear whether raccoon dogs in Chinese farms or other carnivores in such breeds - such as minks - carry SARS-CoV-2. "In 2003 and 2004 there were large studies that were done in China that showed SARS-1 to be related to raccoon dogs and crawling cats." This time - at least so far - that apparently did not happen.

    Coronavirus development in the laboratory is unlikely, according to Drosten 

    Now to take a closer look there might not make sense: "Of course, you have to realize that if you were to examine such stocks now, you might not find the virus that was there - possibly - a year and a half or two years ago. If was culled in between. Or if the virus died in another way. "Regarding the thesis that the virus was accidentally or deliberately created in a laboratory, Drosten said that, from a purely technical point of view, this is technically possible, but: "If someone had developed SARS-2 in this way, then I would say he made it pretty awkward. " With the first SARS virus as the basis, one would most likely have only changed very specific areas for research purposes - but SARS-CoV-2 is full of deviations from the first virus."Let me explain it with a picture: To check, for example, whether adjustments make the virus more contagious, I would take an existing system, incorporate the change and then compare it with the old system," the virologist explained. "If I want to know whether a new car radio improves the sound, I take an existing car and replace the radio there. Then I compare. I don't build a completely new car for it. But that's exactly how it was with SARS-2: The whole car is different. "That is why the idea of ​​a research accident is "extremely unlikely" for him. To the idea of ​​a malicious use of some secret service laboratory, one ultimately has to ask the secret services: "If anything, something like this would probably not come from the Wuhan Virology Institute. This is a reputable academic institute." (dpa/lh)

     

    So... Chris, Mike, Dave and all the PP community let you be educated about a novel virus transmission mechanism - the emission of death screams and roar, whereas aerosols are created -

    And the unbeatable fact comes on the end "the Wuhan Virology Institute is a reputable academic institute..."

    ... and folks remember, Dr. Christian Drosten was the FIRST on CC in Fauchi's fire control mail.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 12:06am

    #13
    AndrewOregon

    AndrewOregon

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 91

    1

    Nature Medicine Coverup Paper authors government agents?

    Here's Doctor Nass' latest musings on some of the authors whom she had run ins with over the years in her vaccine work. She'd be a great interview Chris.

    https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/06/here-is-why-i-believe-nature-medicine.html

    Here's the paper that Chris refers to, I think.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/S41591-020-0820-9

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 1:08am

    #14
    Cre8altern8

    Cre8altern8

    Status: Member

    Joined: Mar 21 2020

    Posts: 3

    1

    Brilliant!

    Chris, you really are an investigative journalist even though you may not have all the credentials.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 2:08am

    #15
    AndrewOregon

    AndrewOregon

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 91

    12

    The Fauci downfall...humor

    Good timeline and character summary here from DRASTIC





    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 2:36am

    #16
    Bill in La Mesa

    Bill in La Mesa

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 95

    10

    Fauci didn't want to treat AIDS patients either

    We know Grouchy Fauci refuses to allow any outpatient therapeutic for COVID, but did you know he refused therapy for HIV patients back in the 80's too?

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295

    Whitewashing AIDS History

    Dr. Anthony Fauci is rewriting history. He is doing so to disguise his shameful role in delaying promotion of an AIDS treatment that would have prevented tens of thousands of deaths in the first years of the epidemic.

    In my book, Body Counts, A Memoir of Politics, Sex, AIDS, and Survival, I recount how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.

    In 1987, pioneering AIDS activist Michael Callen begged Fauci for help in promoting the use of Bactrim as PCP prophylaxis and issuing interim guidelines urging physicians to prophylax those patients deemed at high risk for PCP.

     

    Fauci: “So what actually happened is that Michael came to me and said you know there is this preliminary activity and some small trials that Bactrim works,” Fauci said. “Would you come out and make a guideline to say it should be used by everybody. And I said ‘Michael I can’t do that but what I can do is help design and make sure that the grantees that we fund do a clinical trial in Bactrim to prove or not that it was safe and effective,’” he said. “But I didn’t blow him off and say I don’t want to issue guidelines. The fact is that’s neither within my purview nor within the responsibility or authority I have to issue guidelines.”

     

    He could easily have advocated awareness of the preventive treatment, as the de facto federal AIDS Czar, his influence was and is enormous.

     

    Had Fauci listened to people with AIDS and the clinicians treating them, and responded accordingly, he would have saved thousands of lives. In the two years between 1987, when Callen met with Fauci and 1989, when the guidelines were ultimately issued, nearly 17,000 people with AIDS suffocated from PCP. Most of these people might have lived had Fauci responded appropriately.

     

    Fauci refused to acknowledge the evidence and, according to one account, even encouraged people with AIDS to stop taking treatments, like Bactrim, that weren’t specifically approved for use in people with AIDS. Longtime treatment activist Richard Jefferys wrote in 2001 that Fauci “went as far as telling activists attending a 1987 meeting that there was no data to suggest PCP prophylaxis was beneficial and that it may, in fact be dangerous.”  Fauci’s close colleague, Dr. Samuel Broder, who was head of the National Cancer Institute, even suggested — in the absence of any evidence at all — that the newly introduced antiretroviral, AZT, would make prophylaxis against PCP redundant!

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 5:04am

    #17
    Daniel Hromyko

    Daniel Hromyko

    Status: Member

    Joined: Feb 06 2010

    Posts: 14

    9

    Execution

    Heroin, cannabis, magic mushrooms, and opium are all manufactured. Growing poppies, weed, or mushrooms is manufacturing a controlled substance. There are people all across America (Incarceration Nation) in prison for manufacturing substances to make people feel good, or at worst to stop them from feeling bad, as in drugs like opiates that are truly addictive. Gain of Function, specifically with what Fauci was doing, i.e., weaponizing pathogens under the color of whatever do-good fantasy people are dumb enough to believe, is a horse of another color. Prosecution and execution = accountability. Think about it. What they were, and almost certainly still are doing is madness on a scale that exceeds the Third Reich. The character of these madmen is self evident. To ignore the reality is madness on a societal level. I think about the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution more and more these days. That's where America is heading, except the efficiency of the Guillotine is so antiquated it's almost quaint in comparison to the black hole America is descending in to.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 5:19am

    pmcall

    pmcall

    Status: Member

    Joined: Mar 21 2020

    Posts: 6

    0

    pmcall said:

    You should send a copy of that German article to Senator Rand Paul. I'd love to see what he'd do with it. LOL

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 6:16am

    Mpup

    Mpup

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Mar 01 2020

    Posts: 200

    2

    Reply to AndrewOregon on Covid Control

    Your post with link to control of the Covid narrative is very worthwhile.  Thanks for posting this.  People need to know the truth.  Have shared this with family and friends.          https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/rfk-jr-the/faucis-smoking-gun-with-dr-XiecUw3nxfY/

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 8:11pm

    Hladini

    Hladini

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Dec 28 2011

    Posts: 297

    0

    A New Cult Classic

    Thank you Andrew!  Who ever wrote that script was a genius.  Thanks for lightening up my day.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 8:19pm

    #21
    Hladini

    Hladini

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Dec 28 2011

    Posts: 297

    1

    A new meaning for "Honey Badger"

    If what this guy says is true,  I now understand why all other predator animals steer clear of the humble honey badger!





     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jun 06, 2021 - 9:00pm

    Mike from Jersey

    Mike from Jersey

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Jan 22 2018

    Posts: 561

    1

    Mike from Jersey said:

    Andrew, that was great.

    I was going to say that I am surprised that they allowed that on YouTube, but recently I have seen more freedom there.

    A lot of posts being allowed on Ivermectin. And those posts are getting huge numbers of hits.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jun 07, 2021 - 7:32pm

    #23
    Jinga

    Jinga

    Status: Member

    Joined: Jun 05 2021

    Posts: 4

    2

    Christian Drosten also created the PCR test that WHO rushed thru approval

    The peer review of the research was rushed and financially conlficted as well.

    The paper, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR,” appeared in Eurosurveillance. It was received on January 21 and accepted on January 22, a remarkably quick turnaround

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jun 07, 2021 - 7:57pm

    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 479

    4

    Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has Drosten firmly in his sights!

    See my comment below for more details:

    https://www.peakprosperity.com/forum-topic/nuremberg-2-0/page/4/#post-628267

     

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Tue, Jun 08, 2021 - 11:24am

    #25
    Nelb42

    Nelb42

    Status: Member

    Joined: Jun 08 2021

    Posts: 1

    1

    Wellcome Trust

    I would love to see more information come out on why this group was so heavily involved with Fauci. Also interesting to see their research on trust in medical professionals, science and vaccines in their 2018 world survey, published in June of 2019. Good timing!

    https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Tue, Jun 08, 2021 - 12:08pm

    Bill in La Mesa

    Bill in La Mesa

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 95

    5

    Wellcome Trust Sabotaged HCQ Trials

    I read the Wellcome Trust dictated the protocols for the WHO Recovery & Solidarity HCQ trials (sorry no source/link).

    No treatment till patients were hospitalized/critically ill, then massive doses (2-2.4 grams first 24 hours) that insured cardiac side effects would occur.

    Both trials sabotaged two different ways.  Hard to believe doctors running the trial wouldn't recognize and expose this, but they didn't.  The final nail in the coffin for HCQ, as the press gleefully reported.  Wellcome has earned our enmity.  Never forget!

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Wed, Jun 09, 2021 - 1:38am

    #27
    JessieBarns

    JessieBarns

    Status: Member

    Joined: May 23 2021

    Posts: 3

    0

    JessieBarns said:

    This situation is so hard for biz owners. At carports sunshine coast we are doing our best to tackle these situations.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Thu, Jun 10, 2021 - 11:35am

    #28
    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 479

    0

    Doctors lie, people die. Turning the screws tighter in BC

    https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/greater-victoria-doctors-take-to-social-media-to-tackle-vaccine-hesitancy-1.24328500

    Not one f'ing word about prevention or treatment with all the methods we all know to be effective. Despicable...

    ...Guftason said people concerned about rare vaccine-induced blood clots related to AstraZeneca can choose a messenger RNA vaccine, such as Pfizer or Moderna for their second shot.

    There are no well-identified risk factors for the rare side effect, said Guftason.

    Family physician Dr. Benjamin How of the Victoria Division of Family Practice said because the new vaccines were developed so quickly, “some people wonder if all the necessary steps were taken to test them.”

    How said that while the process was accelerated by unprecedented funding, the clinical trials and safety reviews “actually took about the same amount of time as for other vaccines.”

    Family physician Dr. Kathy Dabrus said for those on the fence, “there is no benefit in waiting.”

    The COVID virus will be around for years and waiting to be ­vaccinated only increases a ­person’s risk of exposure, said ­Dabrus.

    “The risks of the virus are significant and far outweigh the possibility of serious side-effects from any COVID vaccine. Your risk of dying from COVID is greatly reduced after the vaccination and your risk of transmission goes down 90 per cent.”...

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Thu, Jun 10, 2021 - 11:54am

    #29
    nordicjack

    nordicjack

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Feb 03 2020

    Posts: 1086

    3

    Dispicable, yes, nothing short of

    ...Guftason said people concerned about rare vaccine-induced blood clots related to AstraZeneca can choose a messenger RNA vaccine, such as Pfizer or Moderna for their second shot.

    There are no well-identified risk factors for the rare side effect, said Guftason.

    Family physician Dr. Benjamin How of the Victoria Division of Family Practice said because the new vaccines were developed so quickly, “some people wonder if all the necessary steps were taken to test them.”

    How said that while the process was accelerated by unprecedented funding, the clinical trials and safety reviews “actually took about the same amount of time as for other vaccines.”

    Family physician Dr. Kathy Dabrus said for those on the fence, “there is no benefit in waiting.”

    The COVID virus will be around for years and waiting to be ­vaccinated only increases a ­person’s risk of exposure, said ­Dabrus.

    “The risks of the virus are significant and far outweigh the possibility of serious side-effects from any COVID vaccine. Your risk of dying from COVID is greatly reduced after the vaccination and your risk of transmission goes down 90 per cent.”...

    Repulsive statement.  The same amount of time for the studies?  6 weeks really? Zero animal studies, zero long-term studies.  New science.   Manufacturers are aware of ADE and admitted to being "mindful" of the potential, and have not seen it ( but did not look or test for it either )

    And to final note about reduction of likely hood of death by 90% ?  really based on what science or study?   that is absolute lie?  baseless claim.  In fact, we just need to refer back to pfizer's own study.  Obviously, they brought attention to that there were less people in the vaccine group than the control group that got sick with COVID.  However, since there were no clear methods used for this statement as to how they tested and why?, was it based on symptoms or random testing?   Where there any difference in exposure contacts, etc?    They did not do a controlled challenge to the study participants so the statement of reduction is clearly moot.   However, there is one thing they did not mention, and I posted and cited previously,  is that of those who did get sick in each group, that had severe illness , more died in the vaccine group.

    SO, yes, those who had severe illness, a higher percentage died in the vaccine group.   They did not tell you this, this is what we call selective conclusions. They cherry picked the results based on bias.

    So to say that these vaccines received the same time of study as all other vaccines, and then to say that risk reduction is worth it , without any real evidence to that is just criminal.   If anything , you may be able to make argument of reasonable safety for those over 75 vs the risk..  However, for a 19 year old or even reasonably healthy 45 year old , its just insane, egregiously irresponsible and reckless.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Thu, Jun 10, 2021 - 12:05pm

    #30
    Chris Martenson

    Chris Martenson

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Jun 07 2007

    Posts: 5993

    6

    Re: Despicable

    LOL

    Family physician Dr. Benjamin How of the Victoria Division of Family Practice said because the new vaccines were developed so quickly, “some people wonder if all the necessary steps were taken to test them.”

    How said that while the process was accelerated by unprecedented funding, the clinical trials and safety reviews “actually took about the same amount of time as for other vaccines.”

    "Carrying on, Dr. How also revealed that applying this same line of thinking - using additional resources top accelerate timelines - he can't see any reason why nine women shouldn't be able to produce a baby in one month."

    relatedly, when people object "But Chris, you're not a real doctor" I usually think to myself "and that's mostly a good thing" because apparently most "real doctors" stopped learning back in medical indoctrination camp and/or lack the time in their lives to research or think about things properly.

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Thu, Jun 10, 2021 - 12:18pm

    #31
    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 479

    2

    How it is feeling for the vax hesitant in BC and Canada in general

    Royalty-Free (RF) Clipart Illustration of a 3d Blue Guy ...

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Thu, Jun 10, 2021 - 12:28pm

    Jim H

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1412

    2

    Bill - Wellcome is deep in this mess...

    http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/06/jeremy-farrar-director-of-wellcome.html

    From the blog of Meryl Nass, MD;

    Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust and his co-conspirators with a Vietnam connection (Peter Horby and Rick Bright)
    Before Sir Dr. Jeremy Farrar got the plum job of CEO of the wealthiest foundation in the UK and one of the wealthiest in the world, he did research for Oxford University in Vietnam for 18 years. It seems curious how one job led to the other. Will (as is said to happen in Las Vegas) what happened in Vietnam stay in Vietnam? Or will internet sleuths tell us how Farrar was groomed in Vietnam for his current role?

    .....

    When Dr. Martin Landray approached Jeremy Farrar about starting a large multicenter clinical trial in the UK, Farrar told him to talk to Horby. Landray did so, and Horby and Landray became the Principal Investigators for the Recovery trial. Landray was not in on the scheme to overdose patients with hydroxychloroquine, because when he was interviewed by FranceSoir, an online newspaper, he made several mistakes discussing the dose of hydroxychloroquine used. He simply had no idea about the overdoses. (FranceSoir knew.) Landray had been too busy to look up the dose, apparently, that he was responsible for giving to 1600 human guinea pigs.

    Dr. Horby then attempted to give Landray cover in some tweets I read last May or June. Horby said France Soir did not transcribe what Landray said accurately. But France Soir had the recording, so that excuse didn't fly. I blogged about this at the time.

    FranceSoir further revealed how the two Recovery Principal Investigators went back and made changes to the trial documents to cover themselves.

    Neither Landray nor Horby has so much as apologized for using borderline fatal doses in their subjects. Were the subjects' families ever told? Probably not. This happened in the days when there was no visitation allowed in hospitals, and relatives of hospital patients usually had no idea about their treatments.

    Horby is currently on the UK's SAGE committee and is chairman of the NERVTAG committee in the UK, where he continues to exert major influence over the conduct of the pandemic response. Guess what? Two co-conspirators with Fauci/Farrar/Collins on those early February calls included Sir Patrick Vallance and Professor Michael Ferguson, who both serve on SAGE along with Peter Horby, keeping the UK locked down as well as covered up.

    When the news about the Recovery trial's fatal doses came out (I learned it from others on twitter) the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial quickly ended, and Landray and Horby simply said the drug didn't work. They acknowledged that there were about 10-20% more deaths in the hydroxychloroquine arm than in the placebo ("usual care," a.k.a. no drug treatment arm) but have never acknowledged any mistakes, let alone wrongdoing. Using the published Recovery trial statistics, there were about 60 excess deaths over placebo in the HCQ arm (of 400 total) that we can say were likely secondary to an HCQ overdose, and perhaps more if the HCQ benefited some of those who survived the high doses.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jun 12, 2021 - 2:02am

    #33
    girlflower

    girlflower

    Status: Member

    Joined: Nov 09 2008

    Posts: 14

    0

    Pages on Fauci’s emails

    Will someone pls assist in giving me the pages within the FOIA Fauci’s emails where I can find Fauci’s correspondences Chris was talking about?

    The whole document is 3000 pages long and I tried looking up and down for them, but still cannot find them.

    I want to show my disbelieving friends Fauci’s true colors so it is impt I am able to locate the places I can find the emails Chris was talking about.

    Thanks for your help!

    Login or Register to post comments