It's Simple: Trust Yourself

Thursday, April 23, 2009, 9:08 AM

Note: The following is a Martenson Report from January that I am now making freely available. For full access to all Martenson Reports, become an enrolled member.

I was recently asked how it was that I knew to sell my house prior to the bursting of the housing bubble, why I sold out all my stock holdings in favor of gold and silver long before that was an obviously sensible move, and why I am convinced now that the recent actions by the Fed and the Treasury Department are likely to fail.

But most of all, how did I get it right, when so many others missed it entirely?

While I do root around in masses of complicated data, the answer to these questions is surprisingly simple: I trusted myself.

More specifically, I trusted myself enough that when I saw something that didn't make sense, something that just "felt wrong," I took actions accordingly.

  • It didn't make sense to me that a nation could consume beyond its means forever.
  • I was stumped by how an economic system predicated on continual expansion of credit would make a graceful transition to a no-growth environment.
  • I didn't understand how people making $50k per year could buy $500k houses with no money down and have any hope of paying that back.
  • The concept of turning a bunch of subprime loans into higher grade securities, while extracting money along the way, puzzled me deeply.
  • It didn't seem possible to me that money could continue to expand faster than the economy, long-term.

My work and my passion are centered on helping you spot these same sorts of disconnects listed above, so that you can see things more clearly and with less confusion about the direction of things.

The key to navigating during moments when the dominant story is ‘wrong' is to consciously block out the ‘programming' that is constantly reinforcing the status quo and to examine each assertion made by authorities (and by advertising and journalists, and any and all experts, myself included) as though it were possibly a live hand grenade.

While you may ultimately end up agreeing with the assertion or claim, your first instinct should be one of suspicion. Often my first clue that I need to do more research into a particular assertion is simply a gut feeling that "something is not right here." Even when I cannot quite articulate why, and maybe have almost zero hard data on the matter, I have learned to trust my instincts for when a story just doesn't add up.

This principle can be applied to the Bernie Madoff swindle. Many investors have recently described that they had suspicions and concerns over the years about the steadiness of Bernie's investment returns. Yet they kept their money with him. If they had simply trusted themselves and decided to move their money to an institution where they did not have these gut-level concerns, they'd be in infinitely better shape right now.

Here are examples of recent assertions that have sent up my warning flags:

  • Stocks always go up over the long haul.
  • Hydrogen is a suitable replacement for oil.
  • Our economic health depends on "unlocking the credit markets."
  • There's "cash on the sidelines" waiting to go to work. (Which of course, as we know, will drive up prices).

Taking responsibility

I want you to take full responsibility for your future. Heck, I want everybody to take full responsibility for their futures. This begins with educating ourselves about what's really going on in our world, which you are already doing.

One of the main impediments to this, as I see it, is that we have long been trained to trust authorities. We are constantly told, in ways both direct and subtle, that our job is to carry on while the big players take care of things. Our schools teach us that the right answer comes from the front of the classroom, and our jobs often reinforce the value of keeping one's head down and one's opinions to oneself.

But now that the track record of our authorities reveals that relying on their competence alone would be a bad strategy for us, how do we break out of our longstanding habits and forge off on our own to make our own decisions?

The key, again, is to begin by trusting yourself and then acting on what you know to be true, beginning with small steps.

So here, in January 2009, are the three major economic disconnects that I am focusing on:

1. How is it possible for an insolvent nation to borrow money from an insolvent financial system to bail out insolvent financial institutions?

This is the biggest of them all. It is the primary disconnect that makes me go quiet when someone expresses their hope that "Obama will fix things." While I also carry the hope that smarter decisions will someday soon be made in Washington DC, the disconnect emerges when I compare the enormity of the task against the abilities of a new administration, let alone one man.

Until and unless I gain an appreciation for how we can borrow our way out of this mess (and I must confess that this completely eludes me at the moment), I will maintain a hyper-protective stance on my financial holdings.

Remember, the point of a bear market, and we are in the beginning stages of what will probably be the largest one on record, is to destroy everyone's wealth. In 1929, it was said, people lost money. In 1930, the smart people lost their money. In 1931, the really smart people lost their money.

At times like these, when I have very large questions about the overall solvency of the entire system, I strongly resist any and all calls to "get back in the pool" and buy stocks "before they go up" because "they always go up over the long haul" and "there's money on the sidelines."

If you are hearing any of these sorts of urgings from your friends, family, or broker, just ask them the question in bold above.

Because I am stumped as to how an insolvent system can borrow from itself I remain deeply skeptical of any and all claims that we've seen the bottom in the market.

2. How are we supposed to return to a renewed period of economic growth predicated on more consumption, when baby boomers (the wealthiest generation) have seen their two primary forms of wealth, stocks and houses, fail in the same decade?

The near-desperate maneuvering by the federal government and the Federal Reserve are aimed squarely at returning our economy to a position of growth. Growth requires consumers to spend more money on more things going forward.

But our consumer landscape is still dominated by a demographic feature (anomaly?) known as the "baby boomer bulge." As Bill Bonner wrote in Financial Reckoning Day, "Older people down-scale their lives, cut back on their spending, pay down their debts, and add to their savings. As people move from middle age into old age, they increasingly save for retirement and sell any stocks they had during their middle age."

The outlandish spending of the 2003 - 2007 period, which our authorities are now attempting to resuscitate, faces two powerful headwinds:

  1. People's asset-based wealth has been mauled, and will have to be largely rebuilt before the "wealth effect" kicks back in to support spending based on a restored confidence in asset-based wealth. This will take years, if not decades, and boomers will be selling their assets into any attempts to reinflate the housing and stock markets (bubbles).
Much of the recent spending boom was supported, not by assets, but by credit and by spending beyond our means. While the desire to spend beyond one's means is an ever-present human condition, the desire to lend is a more fickle sentiment. It will take a while (years?) to revert back from saving to borrowing and spending.

I see many commentators already calling for a bottom and searching for signs that a recovery in consumer spending is happening. In many cases, these folks are drawing upon historical examples of recessions that have typically lasted about as long as our current recession, implying that this one may already be drawing to a close.

The danger here is failing to appreciate the extent to which our recent excesses were simply over the top and are very unlikely to be repeated any time soon. The greater the excess, the larger the hangover.

3. How can US dollars be considered a "safe haven," given how many of them (trillions and trillions) are being newly created out of thin air?

In a luncheon speech (Jan 15th 2009) in San Francisco recently, Janet Yellon of the Federal Reserve had this to say about the Fed's actions:

Yellen said the Fed is already buying mortgage-backed securities and has begun a program to do the same for bundles of "auto, student, credit card, and...Small Business Administration loans - sectors where the issuance of new securities has slowed to a trickle."

She said this novel pump-priming tactic has already helped push down the rates for 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages.

As for where the Fed has gotten the cash, Yellen said it's simple.

"In a sense we are printing money," she said, adding that she is not worried about inflation right now but the reverse - falling prices that make it harder for businesses to boost sales, prompting more layoffs and causing the downward spiral called deflation.

Let me shorten that up for her. What she meant to say was, "We are printing money."

While I recognize that other countries are doing the same thing, the US is the most indebted country and is printing the most (by far). Sooner or later, investors and countries will lose confidence in a currency that is printed with wild abandon whenever the mood or circumstance strikes. After all, fiat money is founded on confidence, which can evaporate rapidly if the motives and/or competence of the managing authority are called into question.

Without mincing words, the Fed is now "monetizing debt" and runs the very real risk of a massive devaluation of our currency. Of course, I would strongly suspect that this is actually the goal of the Fed, although they will not come right out and say that. Competitive currency devaluations have been a feature of every global financial crisis and are the preferred way of relieving the strains built up by the past periods of excess.

What should you do about this? Trust yourself, and take actions accordingly. Take responsibility for your actions by educating yourself well about issues that you do not fully understand, and do not trust or assume that the authorities know better than you do. Listen to your instincts, act on what you know to be true, and steer clear of the things that don't make sense to you.

As you gain comfort with this material, the actions you will need to take in your own life will become evident.

It's really that simple.

Endorsed Financial Adviser Endorsed Financial Adviser

Looking for a financial adviser who sees the world through a similar lens as we do? Free consultation available.

Learn More »
Read Our New Book "Prosper!"Read Our New Book

Prosper! is a "how to" guide for living well no matter what the future brings.

Learn More »


Related content


ack012's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 7 2009
Posts: 10
Thank you

 Chris, just want to say thank you so much for the all the information you make available to us.  I know you put a lot of time and hard work into what you do and i am very appreciative of it.  Once again, thank you and take care.

billy-bob's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 15 2009
Posts: 8
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

Thanks for asking and answering those excellent questions Chris.

nodebthere's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 17 2008
Posts: 22
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

Thanks Chris :

    Brilliant work, simple breakdown for all to understand.


TheRemnant's picture
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 29 2009
Posts: 141
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself


Nice article.  I wanted to elaborate on this statement:

After all, fiat money is founded on confidence, which can evaporate rapidly if the motives and/or competence of the managing authority are called into question.

I have taken upon myself to investigate deeply into our monetary system to investigate the structural faults of it over the years.

One of the questions I always asked is, "What gives our money value?  Why do we trust it?"  The answer is, like you pointed out, is confidence.  Confidence that others will accept it from you as others are confident it will be accepted from them.

This is not entirely true.  What gives fiat money value?  For example, to build an extreme example to illustrate a point, suppose you and I and other like minded individuals got together, bought 100 acres of land, and intended to live entirely off the grid.  Let's suppose we did it.  Entirely.  We made our own clothes, raised/grew our own food, manufactured our own textiles, utensils, etc.  Let's further say we had our own doctor and maintained our own private road that connected us to the grid.  We became so good at it, no inputs were required from the outside world, and no outputs were provided to the outside world.  We literally became a self-sustaining island.

We would still need to go out and work.  Why?

To pay property taxes.  What happens if you don't pay them, despite NOT using ANY government or other social services at all.  Do you ever own your land?  No.  What you get is a perpetual transferrable government lease when you "buy" a piece of property.  Stop paying those taxes, and you will find out in a hurry who really owns your land, through a series of government escalation, of course.

In what money are those taxes paid?  Fiat.  No other choice.  Else you lose your property.  Thus, government violence gives fiat money value.  If you don't pay your taxes in the form of money the government decrees, they will (eventually) deploy the bad guys to your house wearing blue clown suits, badges, and guns to terrorize you and your family into eviction.

In a true free market, in the absence of government coercion, what would give fiat money value?  If I opened up a money printing shop and told all the participants in the market to use my pretty pieces of paper with different designs and inks on them to indicate varying denominations as money, what do you think would happen?  I'd be laughed out of town and utterly ignored.  However, if I had a bunch of goons loyal to me with superior firepower over the citizens, and I told them they had better use my money and demanded my form of money in tribute/taxes to me...or else, what would happen?

No fiat money in a true free market would have ANY value ascribed to it by the participants in the market at all.  Only commodity based money (most likely gold, silver, or copper etc) or barter would be accepted.

Our fiat money spings into existence when debt is created.  You cover this very well.  When that debt is estinguished, so is the principle plus the interest.  Commodity based money cannot disappear.

Fiat money = debt, enslavement, and unsustainable societies

Commodity based money = prosperity, freedom, and the chance to break free.

My two cents.

Damnthematrix's picture
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 3998
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

All true....  but there could be a revolution where none of us pay the taxes, and there wouldn't be enough "bad guys ..... wearing blue clown suits, badges, and guns to terrorize you and your family into eviction" to deploy to everybody's houses...

Then factor in not servicing your loans, and presto, you have the entire banking/government system on its knees.  Which is all they deserve.


TheRemnant's picture
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 29 2009
Posts: 141
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

All true....  but there could be a revolution where none of us pay the taxes, and there wouldn't be enough "bad guys ..... wearing blue clown suits, badges, and guns to terrorize you and your family into eviction" to deploy to everybody's houses...


No, Mike. They have control of the monetary printing press.  They can always print enough money to pay the drones servicing them.

Damnthematrix's picture
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 3998
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

How long before the drones realise they're being paid monopoly money though?  Besides, if debts were not being serviced, they would have to print Trillions, and the resulting hyperinflation would kill the entire game off...

Wealth is not measured in money.  CM.


BSV's picture
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 26 2009
Posts: 170
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

Mike is probably right, but he may be ahead of the rest of us. He has thought it through to the end game. Let me cite a real world example: Here in Central Texas where I live, the economy is relatively robust. Texas, unlike most of the U.S.A, is doing reasonably well. Texas schools are largely funded by local property taxes. Our local tax authority raised local property valuations last year and I would bet money that they will do so again this year. This despite the fact that property values are falling. That inconvenient fact is awkward but largely irrelevant. There is a need for local property values to rise, so they will rise for purposes of the tax base, whether or not this is factual.

The system depends on constantly rising tax valuations. The largest component of our local tax base is our public schools. We have regular elections to local school boards. Do you suppose that people who are not school boosters get elected? In reality, the people who run for local school board elections are boosters, who can reliably be counted on to vote for hikes in local property taxes to fund ever more gold-plated public school buildings and programs.

Here in Texas we have fabulous public school stadiums and terrific sports programs. Our school children attend classes in first rate buildings staffed by rather poorly paid teachers, whose pay and incentive schemes are rather uninspiring. We spend fabulous amounts of money on bilingual education, when studies show that total immersion in English works very well over a period of a year or so.

It is a totally corrupt system. In the end it will fail. But for now this is the reality that we must deal with.Sigh.

Proc's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Oct 24 2008
Posts: 1
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

Hey all...longtime viewer, first time poster.

Check out this article from Forbes on Friday: "China's Hording Gold"

Chris, I think the Chinese government has been watching the Crash Course.


BigBigMind's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 26 2009
Posts: 1
Re: It's Simple: Trust Yourself

Ryokan, a Zen master, lived the simplest kind of life in a little hut at the foot of a mountain. One evening a thief visited the hut only to discover there was nothing to steal.

Ryokan returned and caught him. "You have come a long way to visit me," he told the prowler, "and you should not return empty-handed. Please take my clothes as a gift."

The thief was bewildered. He took the clothes and slunk away.

Ryoken sat naked, watching the moon. "Poor fellow," he mused, "I wish I could have given him this beautiful moon."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments