Deflation Is Winning

And central banks are running scared
Wednesday, December 10, 2014, 11:21 AM

Remember in the early part of the last decade, long before he was appointed the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke penned an article that caught widespread public attention entitled, “Deflation: It Can’t Happen Here” ?

Bernanke was referring to the deflationary pressures Japan had been dealing with for more than a decade. In the article, Bernanke laid out a game plan for how the Fed would respond if the US ever faced deflationary pressures. His miracle antidote for battling deflation? Printing money. Lots of it.

Little did anyone know at the time that this game plan would become the Fed’s exact response to the credit market crisis and deflationary impulse that erupted in 2008 and 2009.

Moreover, this game plan of printing money was ultimately adopted by every major world central bank in the wake of the meaningful downturn of that period.  We continue to live through this grand and unprecedented global experiment.

Huffing & Puffing

Fast forward six years to the present. Since early 2009, central banks globally have printed more than $13 trillion. In addition, governments across the planet have increased their borrowings at historic proportions (the US just crossed $18T – another new high!), all in an effort to stimulate economies and avoid deflationary pressures. Total US Federal debt has more than doubled in five years, an increase of $9.5 trillion and counting. The objective? Generate inflation.

In addition, central bankers have not been bashful about explicitly targeting inflation rates they would like to achieve in their respective countries.  We know that in the prior cycle, the attempted reconciliation of credit excesses in the private sector was a key reason the US and global economies experienced a deflationary impulse.  Academically, an increase in inflation allows debtors to pay down debt with “inflated dollars” (assuming wages rise), clearly a motivating factor in global central bank decision making over the last half decade. And certainly “inflated dollars” would also allow governments to ease their own ever-accelerating debt burdens. Please remember depreciated currency allows the perception of inflation and “inflated dollars”.

So where do we find ourselves today?

Have the global central banks vanquished the deflationary demon? Have they “created” enough inflation via money printing to allow debt burdens to melt away? Has the Bernanke deflationary antidote been a success for the Fed and their global central banking brethren?

But Where's The Inflation?

We can start with a very simple look at the year-over-year change in the US consumer price index. What we see is that the current level of rate of change in consumer prices is pushing the lows of the current cycle from 2009 to present.  We are not seeing any meaningful inflationary pressures in consumer prices.  Yes, selective consumer goods such as food and health care costs have risen, but we have seen deflationary pressures in electronics prices and in non-essential areas of consumer spending.  We’re now seeing it in energy prices.  On balance, inflationary pressures are modest at best at the headline level.

It just so happens that the favorite inflation gauge of the Fed itself is what's called the personal consumption expenditures price deflator.  Remember that personal consumption drives roughly 70% of US GDP.  Moreover in the current cycle, the Fed professed to believe in the “wealth effect.”  If the Fed could engineer higher household balance sheet values (stock prices and real estate values), their belief was that consumers would feel wealthier and would increase consumption.  Unfortunately this has not come to pass.  Isn’t this clearly the reason the Fed ended Quantitative Easing?

The lack of inflationary pressures in the personal consumption expenditures deflator is clear in this next chart. The message is similar to that of the CPI.  Despite unprecedented money printing (academically thought to be very inflationary) by global central banks, the consumer expenditures price inflation needle has barely moved. Rather, it's pushing multi-decade lows and is an outcome anything but desired by the Fed.

The simple message: Quantitative Easing has failed to generate inflation. Stated alternatively: QE has not been able to overcome still extant deflationary pressures.

One last data point that's very important in terms of the message of the financial markets themselves: You may remember that a few decades ago, the US began issuing inflation-protected Treasury bonds. One would receive coupon income and the CPI rate for the year as a potential total investment return from these bonds.  The securities are known as TIPS – Treasury Inflation Protected Securities.  There's a calculation in the financial markets that has come to be known as the “TIPS inflation breakeven rate”.  This is calculated by taking the yield on a non-inflation protected Treasury bond and subtracting from it the like maturity TIPS coupon yield, leaving us the implied forward inflationary expectations of the financial market. 

In the next chart we are looking at the 5 year inflation expectations rate that is derived by subtracting the yield on a 5-year US Treasury bond from the yield on a 5-year TIPS bond. Once again, the message is strikingly similar to the CPI and personal consumption inflation numbers: the financial market’s expectations for forward inflation is pushing multi-year lows at 1.4% in recent months.

What's important to note is that over the current cycle, inflation expectations in the US (as measured by the TIPS inflation break-even rate) have spiked up temporarily five times, only to turn back down each time. Again, this has occurred while the Fed has printed close to $4 trillion and US Federal debt has simultaneously more than doubled.

Although I won't drag you through a detailed analysis, each time inflation expectations have fallen to current lows, the Fed restarted QE. These restarts also came on the heels of 10% and 20% stock market corrections.  But as we stand here today, current financial market expectations of forward inflation are no higher than they were in late 2009!

Deflation Is Winning & Central Banks Are Running Scared

Just what does all of this tell us?  It tells us that global central banker actions in printing over $13 trillion of new money over the last 6 years have been insufficient to surmount still existing deflationary forces.  It tells us the probability of further global deflationary impulses are very real.  This has direct implications for any sector of the economy or financial markets whose fundamentals are negatively leveraged to deflationary pressures (think banks, real estate, etc.)  Be assured the central bankers are more than fully aware of this.

During October, the US stock market experienced close to an 8% correction, before recovering all of the losses in less than ten trading days.  Foreign markets corrected and recovered in tandem.  On the exact day of the stock market bottom, three important global central banker actions occurred:

  • The European central bank stated they would begin printing money and buying assets within days.
  • The People’s Bank of China delivered a one-time $32 billion immediate stimulus package (after announcing a one-time $100 billion package literally one month prior), and
  • a US Fed member publicly suggested that “if needed, the Fed could do QE4.”

The stock market had not even corrected a historically normal 10% before global central bankers were on the scene to promise ever more printed money.  Moreover, the Fed had not even concluded QE3!  Why would something like this occur unless deflationary pressures were still a significant concern of central banks globally?  They could not even allow the equity market to correct at a normal level without yet another intervention, verbal or otherwise.

As a final anecdote of current central banker deflationary concern: on the last day of October, global financial markets were greatly surprised by the Bank of Japan.  Japan has been engaging in money printing really for decades now, all to no avail in terms of turning their economy.  The money printing heat was turned up significantly in late 2012 when Shinzo Abe was elected prime minister.  Since then, the value of the Yen has declined by 35%.  Despite all of this turbo-charged money printing, the two negative GDP reads over the last two quarters place Japan in academic recession.  Forget growth, unprecedented money printing could not even prevent perceptual recession!

On the last day of October the Bank of Japan (BOJ) announced they would increase their money printing from $70 billion monthly to $90 billion.  At this rate, the BOJ will essentially buy all newly issued Japanese government debt looking out over the foreseeable future using money printed out of thin air.  There is no precedent for this across history.  Once again, global stock markets went vertical with the news of yet another central bank driven liquidity tsunami to come. 

What's Coming Next            

So, if central bankers are obviously still very worried about deflation, should we as investors worry?

Or will even more money printing in Japan, and elsewhere around the world, eventually be the solution? 

We need to watch the global inflation numbers very closely as we move ahead.  We need to remember that the major global central banks (US Fed, Bank of Japan, European Central Bank and the People’s Bank of China) have already pushed interest rates to or near zero.  As such, the efficiency of their policies now rests virtually entirely on their supposed ability to generate inflation.  An ability that has proven elusive for six years now.

In Part 2: What Deflation Means For Investors, we examine the receding level of global liquidity and explore what will happen to all the asset classes so dependent on that -- up until now -- ever-rising tide. The global financial system is now completely tuned for a world of more liquidity, more credit. It's not prepared, and perhaps not able, to deal with the new set of rules deflation is poised to usher in.

Click here to access Part 2 of this report (free executive summary; enrollment required for full access)

Endorsed Financial Adviser Endorsed Financial Adviser

Looking for a financial adviser who sees the world through a similar lens as we do? Free consultation available.

Learn More »
Read Our New Book "Prosper!"Read Our New Book

Prosper! is a "how to" guide for living well no matter what the future brings.

Learn More »


Related content


LesPhelps's picture
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 30 2009
Posts: 567
Doubling time


Total US Federal debt has doubled in less than 5 years...


dt = 70/g; 70 = dt x g; g = 70/dt; g = 70/5; g = 14%.

US Federal debt has had an average growth rate of 14% over the last 5 years.

climber99's picture
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 12 2013
Posts: 140
The World needs growth in its

The World needs growth in its GDP in excess of the growth in its population. Well that isn't going to happen, however much "money" central banks create or politicians promise.  The fundamental reason for this is that Net energy available to society per capita (ie. minus the energy used by the energy sector) is topping out. 

Increasing Net energy is the real "wealth creator" not "money" which is a human construct.

When Net energy available to society starts to decline we will see huge competition for available jobs, and competition to retain market share of discretionary goods for increasingly scarce discretionary "money". This makes wages fall, prices of discretionary goods fall.  "wealth" will diminish.

When things get really desperate, debt and government liabilities will have to be tackled. I think the end point will be that debt, liabilities, pensions and saving accounts will have to be recalibrated to a hugely devalued currency.  To reduce inequality, wealth taxes on people owning physical assets like land and gold will be introduced.  There's going to be very many people who are going to be very unhappy.  Try explaining falling Net energy to rioting men on the streets and politicians calling for war.


darturtle's picture
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 24 2014
Posts: 29
China's Interest Rate is Not Zero

Nov. 21, China's central bank PBOC cut interest rate:

1. One year lending rate from 6% to 5.6%

2. One year deposit rate from 3% to 2.75%

See link:

darturtle's picture
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 24 2014
Posts: 29
Heavy Debts Ensure Deflation

It is heavy debts. If you look through history, you can easily find heavy debts cause deflation. Hyperinflation happened (if happened) only after deflation ran through its cause which destroyed most credits.

Deflation can be characterized as selective defaults to destroy credits. Almost everyone wants his/her debt inflate away but not a penny of his/her bank account is inflated away.

Today, bonds are not just held by few riches nor only federal governments issue debts. Many pension funds, insurance companies, banks, ... park their money in debt instruments.

Ask a civil servant, perhaps you are one, are you OK to lose your pension? for the nation's good? Detroit's bankrupt showed us - just surf the web, city retiree came up with many ideas (tax #@%, sell museum collections, ...)  except cut their pensions. Not just civil servants, government contractors also have no stomach to lose their business. As you can see from your very own eyes - they would rather pull US into war to prevent any lost of business. If Irag and Afghan war cease as originally planned, all special budgets cease.

This leaves Uncle Sam without choice but to protect its credit worthiness even at expense of credits of its citizens who vote.

We will see defaults from one sector to another. No, Uncle Sam won't print money to save you. QE has demonstrated this - save only well connected and Uncle Sam himself. Just ask yourself, have Uncle Sam increased deficit on people due to QE? What broke Sequester, the only meaningful spending cut in recent year, if not Republican could not tolerate the defense part, even so modest. Why Republican fought very hard before end of 2012 on ending so called Bush tax cut but made little to no effort on extending social security tax cut?

Suldog1's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 28 2012
Posts: 1
No place for naivete

"Little did anyone know at the time that this game plan would become the Fed’s exact response to the credit market crisis and deflationary impulse that erupted in 2008 and 2009."

With all due respect, bull.  

The pirates of Wall Street knew precisely that would be the response.  And in knowing so, they successfully lobbied all of the law changes and developed all of the massive derivative programs that would be necessary for them to use as they deliberately blew their bubbles, and extracted all the wealth they could out of them (both on the way up and the way down), knowing full well Banana Republic Ben would pass the bail directly to the rest of the country.

Their eyes were wide open. His, academically ignorant but nonetheless compliant eyes, were not.  Maybe he was too busy admiring himself in the mirror.

And the ensuing disgrace has been a gut-wrenching train-wreck to witness.

Wendy S. Delmater's picture
Wendy S. Delmater
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 13 2009
Posts: 1904
one quibble

" . . . deflationary pressures in electronics prices..."

This is mostly due to Moore's Law.

Spot-on, otherwise.

treebeard's picture
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 18 2010
Posts: 524
Net Energy

Excellent points all, the collective mind at PP is brilliant.  We all now understand that net energy reductions from the environment are driving the economic downturn and resulting debt build up.  Deflation, driven by debt defaults and stagnating incomes will eventually drive us into hyperinflation when all the bad debts have been blown out and the money printing continues.  Citigroup has written legislation to eliminate the “PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES” which was in Dodd-Frank.  That legislation is now working its way through the House.  We can all see where this is going, anybody else getting a little deja vu here, welcome to 2008 all over again.

Sad thing is we don't have to do this, we can stop trying to swim up stream.  We can decide to stop destroying natural systems and instead work with them and participate in their natural abundance.  We don't have to destroy the soils natural productive capacity and replace it with fossil fuel consumption.  We can use diffuse energy saving technologies to create societies that are close to net zero energy consumers.  Its all about relationships and the type of technologies that we decide to engage with. Pain is part of life, but suffering is optional, maybe.  Looks like we may finally make the right choices after we have tried everything else.

LesPhelps's picture
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 30 2009
Posts: 567
I agree that net energy is an issue, but...

...perhaps not the most immediate issue we face.  We'd be in trouble with debt anyway. 

Our monetary/banking system relies on a growing money supply and growing debt.  We are on the vertical slope of an exponential curve regarding debt growth. 

Look at US Federal debt growth rate of over 14% average the last five years.  Even in good times US GDP growth does not stay above 5% for any significant number of years.  Less than 5% GDP growth does not support greater than 14% debt growth, with or without abundant energy.

Someone may have combined private, corporate, state and federal debt growth numbers.  I do not, but I suspect that it's growing well over 5%, driven by government debt growth at all levels.

AKGrannyWGrit's picture
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 6 2011
Posts: 299
A Matter of Perspective

".... Inflationary pressures are modest at best..."  Ah as Mrs. Middle America the inflation our family is experiencing sure doesn't seem modest, it's rather painful to be specific.  Food, utilities, taxes, insurance are all going up and here in Alaska we had two refineries close, all the oil is shipped out of state, refined and then brought back to be sold at the pump so low gas prices, mmmmm nope, probably never again in my lifetime.

Inflation, deflation it's very confusing I thought it was either or but it seems we are experiencing both at the same time????  It's like a foreign language, I have to get out my dictionary and translate.  A really good article though, I will read it again as the 2nd time around often helps to solidify the message. Glad Mr. Pretti is contributing, really enjoy the podcasts with him.

AK GrannyWGrit

agitating prop's picture
agitating prop
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: May 28 2009
Posts: 797
Just passed bill

I wonder what impact the bill just passed by both houses (I think?) will have on inflation/deflation?  There is a provision in the bill that allows banks to take huge risks again, by insuring taxpayers pick up the tab. 

I wonder if this provision will actually help free up money for mortgage lending. The pendulum has swung too much to the other extreme, post sub prime fiasco. All cash transactions and crazy difficult to buy a house for the average person lately. Is there some small upside to the debacle currently called, government?

darleneortiz's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 26 2014
Posts: 17
According to the Central

According to the Central bank, from the last year US consumer price index is decreasing in a certain rate. This will sometime leads to increase in the price of many product in the market to increase the profit and also to maintain the price index.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments