Peak Prosperity

Peak Cheap Oil - Crash Course Chapter 20

Still a very big, very real, threat to our way of life
Friday, November 7, 2014, 7:31 PM

Chapter 20 of the Crash Course is now publicly available and ready for watching below.

Energy is the lifeblood of any economy.  But when an economy is based on an exponential debt-based money system and that is based on exponentially increasing energy supplies, the supply of that energy therefore deserves our very highest attention.

But we need to be careful here because it’s a mistake to lump all types of energy together because they have very different uses in our economy and they are not interchangeable.

What we’re going to examine in this chapter on Peak Cheap Oil is transportation fuels.  The liquids we put in our trucks and cars and airplanes.  Why?

Because 95% of everything that moves from point A to point B across the globe does so based on petroleum derived liquid fuels.  This makes petroleum quite special and unique.

And despite vastly increasing the global spend on oil operations, despite the shale oil "miracle" so loudly touted by the press -- global production remains nearly unchanged. In just a few short years, it’s now costing us double to extract roughly the same amount of oil out of the ground.

What’s clearly at work here is that we’re finding more oil, but it’s expensive. Yet total global demand for oil will climb as developing countries expand their economies and world population continues to grow. Competition for hydrocarbons will become more fierce than it has ever been.

I’m soft-pedaling this to an enormous degree.  Let me be blunt.  If we are already at peak, as the data suggest is possible, then we are all in trouble.


For the best viewing experience, watch the above video in hi-definition (HD) and in expanded screen mode

Coming next Friday: Chapter 21: Shale Oil

For those who simply don't want to wait until the end of the year to view the entire new series, you can indulge your binge-watching craving by enrolling to The entire full new series, all 27 chapters of it, is available -- now-- to our enrolled users.

The full suite of chapters in this new Crash Course series can be found at

And for those who have yet to view it, be sure to watch the 'Accelerated' Crash Course -- the under-1-hour condensation of the new 4.5-hour series. It's a great vehicle for introducing new eyes to this material.


OK – we’re up to the chapter on Peak Cheap Oil and this one is a doozy.

This is one of the most important chapters, this is a big subject, and I wish to acknowledge that much of this chapter stands on the shoulders of the hundreds of dedicated people who have gathered the data, made the points, and tirelessly worked to advance our understanding of the role of energy in our lives. 

I tip my hat to these sources and many others.

Energy is the lifeblood of any economy.  But when an economy is based on an exponential debt-based money system and that is based on exponentially increasing energy supplies, the supply of that energy therefore deserves our very highest attention.

But we need to be careful here because it’s a mistake to lump all types of energy together because they have very different uses in our economy and they are not interchangeable.

What we’re going to examine in this chapter on Peak Cheap Oil is transportation fuels.  The liquids we put in our trucks and cars and airplanes.  Why?

Because 95% of everything that moves from point A to point B across the globe does so based on petroleum derived liquid fuels.  This makes petroleum quite special and unique.  

Said another way, currently natural gas and coal cannot be substituted for oil. It’s not reasonable to lump them all together. In fact, it would be risky to do so, as it would lead us to make some very bad decisions about our future.

In order to understand what “Peak Cheap Oil’ means, we need to share a common understanding about how oil fields work and how oil is extracted. 

A common misperception is that an oil rig is plunked down over an oil field, a pipe is inserted and then oil gushes from a big, underground lake or cavern that eventually gets sucked dry. 

It turns out that it is pretty much just solid rock down there and oil is only found in porous rocks, like sandstone, that permit the oil to flow through the rocks crevices and pores. 

No vast caverns or lakes of oil exist down there. Oil has to be carefully extracted from what turns out to be a very solid rock matrix.

It’s better to think of a conventional oil field like a margarita where the oil is the tequila mix and the rock is the crushed ice. 

When an oil field is tapped we find that the amount of oil that comes out if it follows a very prescribed pattern over time that ends up resembling a bell curve. 

At first, shortly after the drink is discovered, there’s just one straw in our margarita but then with excitement   more and more straws are stuck in and more and more drink rather easily flows out of the glass. 

But then that dreaded slurping sound begins and now, no matter how many new straws are inserted and no matter how hard they are sucked upon, the amount of margarita coming out of the glass declines until it is all gone and we are only left with ice. 

That’s pretty much exactly how an oil field works.

Every oil field exploited to date has exhibited this same basic extraction profile.  And what is true for one is equally true when we measure across many oil fields and then sum the result. 

Because individual fields peak, so to do collections of fields. Peak Oil, then, is NOT an abstract theory so much as it is a physical description of an extremely well characterized physical phenomenon. 

How much oil remains to be discovered is a theory, but the process by while oil fields depleted is rather well-understood. Peak Oil is simply a fact.  

Also, Peak Oil, is NOT synonymous with “running out of oil”.  At the moment of the peak roughly half the oil that was there in the first place still remains.

But something interesting happens at the half-way mark.  Where oil gushed out under pressure at first, the back half usually has to get laboriously pumped out of the ground at higher cost, obviously. 

Where every barrel of oil was cheaper to extract on the way up, the reverse is true on the way down. Each barrel becomes more costly in terms of time, money and energy to extract.  Eventually, it costs more to extract a barrel of oil than it is worth and that’s when an oil field is abandoned. 

Here’s our experience with oil in United States. From the first well drilled in 1859 until 1970 more and more oil was progressively pumped from the ground. 

But after that point less and less came out of the ground.  It is said, then, that the US hit a peak of oil production in 1970 at just under 10 million barrels a day and today produces less than that. Those are the facts.

Counting ONLY crude oil consumption here, the remaining balance of the United States’ 15 million barrel a day crude oil habit is   met by imports.  That is, the US imports close to half of its daily needs.

Although the amount of oil the US imports is falling due to the combined effects of producing more and consuming less, the temporary boost from shale oil should be seen as exactly that; a relative flash in the pan.  We'll cover that in more detail in the next chapter

Now in order to produce oil, you have to first find it, right?  It’s pretty hard to pump something you haven’t found.  US oil discoveries peaked in 1930, which yields a gap between a peak in discovery and a peak in production of 40 years.  Remember that number.

Here’s an interesting aside. Suppose we wanted to become “independent from imported oil” and decided to replace those 7 million imported barrels with some other form of energy. 

Ignoring for the moment that you cannot substitute electricity for liquid fuels, Those 7 million barrels represent the same power equivalent as more than 500 additional nuclear power plants. 

Considering the concerns we have with the 104 we have operating right now, I think it’s safe to say nuclear power is not a realistic candidate for reducing oil imports.

Well then how much would we have to increase our solar wind and biomass energy production to equal 7 million barrels a day? 

There we’d have to increase our currently installed base by a factor of 1,400.  Not 1400%. 1,400 times as much.

When we look at   worldwide oil discoveries we find that those   increased in every decade up to the 1960’s and then have decreased in every decade since then with future projections looking even more grim. 

The exact peak of discovery?  That was in 1964, 44 years ago, and that is another cold, hard, indisputable fact.

Remember, in order to produce oil you have to find it first. 

And here is the third, and final fact about production I want to present.  This is a chart of global crude oil production only – it leaves out biofuels and natural gas liquids.

Why? Well, they only amount to roughly 10 million barrels a day collectively, and they’re not used nearly with the ubiquity oil is in global transportation. 

Conventional crude is the easy, high-energy yield stuff and it is what the world’s past 100 years of growth has been built upon. 

We can see here that since mid-2004, for some reason, oil production has been flat.  Whatever the reason for this is, it isn’t price because oil has climbed   from $50 a barrel to around $100 a barrel in 2012 and 2013.

And it isn’t because oil companies have been skimping on investments in oil exploration and production – those budgets have more than doubled from $300 billion in 2005 to $700 billion in 2013.

If ever there was a strong incentive to get oil out of the ground and off to market, $100 a barrel is it; and spending $700 billion is ample sign of dedication to that cause.

And yet, despite all that, global production remains nearly unchanged. In just a few short years, it’s now costing us double to extract roughly the same amount of oil out of the ground.

What’s clearly at work here is that we’re finding more oil, but it’s expensive. Even vastly increased oil budgets have only managed to battle the declines in conventional oil to a standstill.

Interestingly, the global peak in discoveries was exactly 40 years prior to the leveling off of this production graph possibly echoing the US gap between the discovery and production peaks. 

I’m soft-pedaling this to an enormous degree.  Let me be blunt.  If we are already at peak, as these data suggest is possible, then we are in trouble.

However, the most urgent issue before us does not lie with identifying the precise moment of peak oil. 

That is, truthfully, an academic distraction because the economic dislocations will begin as soon as there’s a gap between supply and demand that is solved by higher prices.

Here’s a very simple and clever way to think about the supply and demand problem that was developed by Dallas geologist Jeffrey Brown which he calls   the export land model. 

Suppose that we have a hypothetical country that produces 2 million barrels of crude a day but which is declining at 5% a year. 

We’d note that, at first, they’d be able to export 2 million barrels; but after ten years that would decline to one and a quarter million barrels a day.  This seems manageable.  But now, suppose that this country uses oil itself, as all countries do.

Taking that into account, we see that our hypothetical country consumes 1 million barrels a day, with this internal demand increasing by 2.5% a year.  This is also reasonable.

So, what happens to future exports under this model?  They go to zero in just ten years.  This is the miracle of compounding but in reverse where exports are eaten into from both ends. 

It turns out that this is a very realistic scenario because we can already observe that production is declining even as demand is increasing in a number of countries.

When world production will hit its exact peak is a matter of some dispute with estimates ranging from right now to some 30 years away.  But as I said before, the precise moment of the peak is really just an academic concern.

What we need to be most concerned with is the day that world demand outstrips available supply. It is at that moment that the oil markets will change forever and probably quite suddenly. 

First we’ll see massive price hikes, that’s a given. But do you remember the food ‘shortages’ that seemingly erupted overnight back in February of 2008?

Those were triggered by the perception of demand exceeding supply, which led to an immediate export ban on food shipments by many countries. 

This same dynamic of national hoarding will certainly be a feature of the global oil market once the perception of shortage takes hold.  When that happens, our concerns about price will be trumped by our fears of shortages

In order to understand why oil is so important to our economy and our daily lives, we have to understand something about what it does for us.

We value any source of energy because we can harness it to do work for us.  For example, every time you turn on a 100-watt light bulb, it is the same as if you had a fit human being in the basement pedaling as hard as they could to keep that bulb lit. 

That is how much energy a single 100-watt light bulb uses.  In the background while you run water, take hot showers, and vacuum the floor, it is as if your house is employing the services of at least 50 such extremely fit bike riders. 

This “energy slave count” if you will, exceeds that of some kings in times past.  It can therefore truly be said that we are all living like kings.  Although we may not appreciate that because it all seems so ordinary that we take it for granted.

And how much ‘work’ is embodied in a   gallon of gasoline, our most favorite substance of them all?  Well, if you put a single gallon in a car, drove it until it ran out, and then turned around and pushed the car home you’d find out. 

It turns out that a gallon of gas has the equivalent energy of 500 hours of hard human labor, or 12-and-a-half 40 hour work weeks.

So how much is a gallon of gas worth? $4 $10?  Is you wanted to pay this poor man $15 and hour to push your car home then we might value a gallon of gas at $7,500.

Here’s another example.  It has been calculated that the amount of food that average North America citizen consumes in year requires the equivalent   of 400 gallons of petroleum to produce and ship.

At $4/gallon that works out to $1600 of your yearly food bill is spent on fuel, which doesn’t sound too extreme. 

However, when we consider that those 400 gallons represent the energy equivalent of 100 humans working year round at 40 hours a week, then it takes on an entirely different meaning.  

This puts your diet well out of the reach of most kings of times past.  Just to put this in context, as it is currently configured, food production and distribution uses fully  2/3rds of our domestic oil production.  This is one reason why a cessation of imports would be, shall we say, disruptive.

Besides the way that oil works tirelessly in the background to make our lives easy beyond historical measure, oil is a miracle in other ways.  In this picture , a typical American family was asked to cart out onto their front lawn everything in their house that was derived from oil.  That’s quite a sight.

How easily could we replace the role of oil in our style of consumer-led, growth-based economy? Not very.   

We currently use oil mainly for transportation, sitting at right around 70% of all oil consumption.  The next biggest block is for industrial purposes followed by residential which means heating oil. 

This last, tiny little sliver?  That’s oil used to generate electricity.  With the exception of Biofuels, which I’ll get to later, all renewable energy resources either provide heat or electricity meaning that even if we entirely replaced ALL of the electricity and heat currently provided by oil with renewables, we’d only be addressing these tiny slices here.

And in the industrial processes, oil is the primary input feedstock to innumerable necessities of life such as   fertilizer, plastics, paint, synthetic fibers, innumerable chemical processes, and flying around.  When we consider   other potential fuel sources we find that they are mostly   incapable of fulfilling these needs.

Biofuels and coal could potentially fill some of these functions but certainly not without a massive reinvestment program and not anytime soon. 

Let’s review a few key facts.  You have to find oil before you can produce it and key fact #1   is that world oil discoveries peaked in 1964. 

US discoveries peaked in 1930 and 40 years later production peaked.  We are now 44 years after the global discovery peak.

Key fact #2 is that   world production of conventional crude has been flat for the past 8 years even as prices have increased by more than 100%. 

Taken together, key facts #1 and #2 suggest the possibility that Peak Oil is already upon us. 

If true, then we are going to wish with all our hearts that we had begun preparing for this moment a decade or more ago.

Key fact #3 is that the US oil imports are the energy equivalent of more than 500 nuclear power plants which is five times as many nuclear plants as currently exist in America and nearly twice the total number of nuclear plants in the entire world.

The next key concept of the Crash Course is that Peak Cheap Oil is a well defined process that is nothing more than a physical description of how oil fields age. 

We have literally thousands of studied examples under our belts and given the preponderance of evidence, the debate on Peak Oil is over. It is a mathematical inevitability at current consumption levels. Only when the peak will arrive is up for discussion. 

Mostly hidden from us in plain sight is Key Concept #10: The amount of work that oil performs in service to the average person is equivalent to having hundreds of slaves.  

It is this work that makes our lives what they are; staggeringly comfortable by historical standards.  The average middles class life in western society would be the envy of kings in times past.

The next key concept of the crash course is that oil is a magical substance of finite supply but of unlimited importance.  This cannot be overstated. 

Transitioning from one fuel source to another is a devilishly expensive proposition posing enormous challenges with respect to cost, scale and time. 

Our species transitioned over many decades from wood to coal because coal was a better fuel source. 

And we transitioned over several decades from coal to oil for the same reason.  In both cases this happened because the new fuel source was plentiful, cheap, and higher-yielding in terms of energy output per unit of weight compared to the older fuel.

Nobody has been able to advance any candidates as our next source of transportation energy that is better than oil on all three counts. 

A common pushback to this point is a firm belief many people hold that new technological breakthroughs will ride to our rescue here.

I’ll explain in a future chapter why this is very likely to prove a false hope.

All I’ll do here is remind you that technology is not a source of energy – it may well help us to better exploit our existing energy sources by extracting them more easily, or consuming them more efficiently – but technology can’t create energy for us.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics prevents that. So, it is a big mistake to confuse technology with energy sources.

And finally, what we really need to keep a careful eye out for is the supply of oil being exceeded by demand and this raises the next Key Concept: Oil exports are being hit two ways; by rising demand and declining production.  

This raises the prospect that the moment when the world’s nations finally realize that there is not enough oil to supply everybody may come much sooner than most suspect. 

Exponential functions are hard for most humans to grasp and oil exports are being doubly-squeezed, subjecting them to a surprisingly high rate of decline.                

This completes an immensely brief tour through peak cheap oil.  If you have not already done so, you owe it to yourself to become knowledgeable on this subject due to its unequalled importance. 

We have links aplenty on the essential books, papers, articles, websites and other resources on

In the next section   we will address the current quote-unquote revolution occurring in shale oil and gas. I’ll explain why its impact is likely to be short-lived, and why it really won’t offer much help in addressing our energy predicament.

Please join me for the next chapter addressing the false promise of Shale Oil.

Thank you for your attention.

Endorsed Financial Adviser Endorsed Financial Adviser

Looking for a financial adviser who sees the world through a similar lens as we do? Free consultation available.

Learn More »
Read Our New Book "Prosper!"Read Our New Book

Prosper! is a "how to" guide for living well no matter what the future brings.

Learn More »


Related content


Phaedrus the younger's picture
Phaedrus the younger
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 21 2013
Posts: 69
favourite chapter!

Peak cheap oil is the best so far - and it's the burning platform that drives my sense of urgency (sorry for the unintended puns btw).  Well done Chris, Adam. 

travissidelinger's picture
Status: Bronze Member (Online)
Joined: Nov 17 2010
Posts: 57
Your slid on oil production

Your slid on oil production at 6 minutes and 45 seconds into the video, you should overlay a Brent oil prices on the same chart.  Then people can see that prices quadrupled what production remained fairly flat.


cmartenson's picture
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 7 2007
Posts: 6152
Great idea
travissidelinger wrote:

Your slid on oil production at 6 minutes and 45 seconds into the video, you should overlay a Brent oil prices on the same chart.  Then people can see that prices quadrupled what production remained fairly flat.


Thank you Travis, and we can easily do that now because we invested (heavily) in producing the whole thing in final cut so we can snip and tuck as we please.

And more widely, anybody with any other suggestions please feel perfectly free to offer them as we can improve all of this with your help.

It may take us time to get to those improvements (just setting expectations here) given our bandwidth, but we have a safe place to collect and store those ideas until we are ready to implement them.

dryam2000's picture
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 6 2009
Posts: 294
Thank You Chris


I just want to say thanks again for everyone's efforts with your GREAT website.  I'm addicted to learning & PeakProsperity is my top web resource. 

Wildlife Tracker's picture
Wildlife Tracker
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 14 2012
Posts: 403
Other chart recommendations

Just a couple suggestions....

First, it's not a bar chart, therefore the Y axis does not need to start a 0. A scale represented by the white box would be more appropriate and would more effectively tell your story. Also, if I were to draw a linear regression line throughout the chart I could show that production is actually growing at a pretty steady rate...

HOWEVER, split the data into two groups and you can effectively tell the story that you want to tell. The regression from 1994-2001 is very different than the regression from 2001 to 2013.

The regression gap (the space between the green line and the red line) in 2013 is very powerful visually I believe. There are more effective ways to present this information (regression lines being one way). Also, production is dramatically slowing might be a better title to the chart because the red line is not really flat.

Erik T.'s picture
Erik T.
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 5 2008
Posts: 1234
Dates and math...


Your work is outstanding as always! Kudos and congrats on the new CC! :)

Just a minor nit... Having been born in 1965, I am absolutely flattered by your multiple re-assertions that 1964 was "44 years ago". But as a realist, I have to confess to being older than that. I think that a close review of the arithmetic would reveal that 1964 was actually 50 years ago. Meaning that I am officially "old", but still have enough on the ball to notice such small matters of detail.

All the best,


S7's picture
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 29 2009
Posts: 25
There may be an alternative

For the people that see the times in which we live this is one of many life changing events that is on the near horizon. It may be a blessing if oil becomes so expensive that it is cost prohibitive to use. From what I understand, what may be contributing to or be the reason entirely, is the atmospheric oxygen levels have dropped from 30-35% from trapped air samples scientist have measured in sap and ice that is hundreds of thousands years old,(I doubt the time scale), to 14-18% in densely populated cities today. America spends the most on health care in the entire world yet we are only #1 in one category, obesity.(Epigenitics, Joel Wallach) The food we eat has so many trace chemical fertilizers and pesticides that are "within the acceptable limit", that are bodies are overburdened with poisons. Do we think the current honeybee decimation is some random chance ocurance? There may not be an instant cure to replace petroleum, and we do not have a political system nor the people in the system that can produce the change we need, however, there is a energy source that is unlimited that could replace everything, and that is the electricity in the ionosphere.

Nikola Tesla was building a tower around 1905 that many believe was an attempt to tap into this source. He performed many experiments in his Colorado laboratory before he started constructing the tower that proved that electricity could be transmitted wirelessly.  More recently, Professor James McCanney claims he has discovered how to harness this electricity and has written a great book that explains the physics of sun/earth weather and how the solar wind passing the earth produces these electrical charges in the ionosphere. I think that there are "controlling interests" in or behind the government that do not want to have a clean, unlimited supply of energy that would be cheap. They are control maniacs, and they will uses any crisis to gain more control over a population.

I think the best thing we can do, is learn how to grow a portion or most of our own food, pull out as much as possible of the broken fiat currency system in the world, live a simpler lifestyle and pray for supernatural intervention. Unfortunately what would probably have to happen for people to change is some cataclysmic event like has happened in the past. Then we start over in the cave ages. Not my idea of a teachable moment.

khinnenkamp's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 2 2014
Posts: 7
Hemp for future

Hi Chris,

You mention biofuels, but never hemp specifically. Hemp is a champion for growing fuel, the densest biomaterial that can be grown on the planet. Hemp heals the soil it is grown in, requires no petrochemicals to grow, and can be used to make a myriad of commercial products including biodegradable plastics, durable clothing, car parts, superior paper and thousands of other things that we consume. And it is looking like the best medicine on the planet as well due to it's many conditions it is being shown it can treat. Grown locally, it can reduce the need for pet transportation costs commonly used to ship fuel around. 

We have to get over our social stigma of hemp's defamed cousin marijuana. If we begin to transition to a hemp economy now, or at least let hemp compete, we might stave off the worst of the coming collapse in oil production. And we can take advantage now of all of the things we can use hemp for. We need to begin growing and building infrastructure now to handle hemp processing.

Couldn't you do a section in your series about hemp? There is more than enough information out there. I would be happy to share what I have found to help get started with your research. 

robie robinson's picture
robie robinson
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 25 2009
Posts: 1253
Post links khinnenkamp

I'm a farmer and interested in such.  I've grown and continue to grow, although its an annual here, sun hemp.  good stuff

Bankers Slave's picture
Bankers Slave
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 26 2012
Posts: 523
A bit of hemp history

Arthur Robey's picture
Arthur Robey
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 4 2010
Posts: 3936
Here is McCanney's link S7

Here is McCanney's link S7

S7's picture
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 29 2009
Posts: 25
The missing link

Hopefully others will visit his web page. He has a great amount of information regarding the science that if not being taught in the education system today. I wasn't sure about posting links to others websites on Peak Prosperity so I did not. I've been listening to him for about 3 years and really enjoy the education. He has his own bias, but it makes more sense than what anybody else can offer. The history of past cataclysmic events that have caused a "reset" of the progress of humanity is fascinating.


khinnenkamp's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 2 2014
Posts: 7
True History of Marijuana

Very informative video. For those wanting to look further into this, read "The Emperor Wears No Clothes" by Jack Herer, and Hemp: "Lifeline to the Future" by Chris Conrad.

darleneortiz's picture
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 26 2014
Posts: 17
By the speed we are consuming

By the speed we are consuming petroleum, it will come to end very early. The price of petroleum is increasing, but consumption of petroleum products is also increasing. We have to limit our consumption otherwise our children's will never able to use these.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments