Blog

Fed Shocker: No Taper

As we've long said, the Fed has put itself in a box
Wednesday, September 18, 2013, 4:20 PM

The Federal Reserve today (9/18/13) surprised the world, and me, too, by not reducing the amount of bond purchases from the current $85 billion per month to something less.  The guesses and expectations were for between $10 billion and $15 billion less per month, to bring the number down to "only" $70 to $75 billion per month.

But the actual reduction was $0, leaving the purchases at $85 billion per month.

The financial markets reacted instantly.

Of course, the dollar got hit right away and for a pretty good amount, given that it's the world's major reserve currency losing more than 0.75% in the blink of an eye:

Gaining far more than the dollar lost was pretty much everything else.  Stocks went up hard; bonds, gold, oil you name it.

Starting with the bond market, the ten-year U.S. Treasury yield fell by more than ten full basis points, or one tenth of a percent, which is really remarkable for such a large and liquid market:

What this tells us is that lots and lots of market participants had been selling Treasury notes in anticipation of a $10 billion cut in the Fed current quantitative easing (QE) program.  I guess we can further infer that $10 billion/month buys you about ten basis points, which I suppose is a good deal as long as you are printing money out of thin air.

Next, the oil market took off as well, although it had been rising steadily all day for some other sets of reasons, but the non-taper announcement tossed another buck onto the price:

Finally, gold really punished the shorts today, and on massive volume, too, popping more than 2% instantly on the news.

In summary, the U.S. financial markets just exploded on the idea that the Fed was not going to reduce its asset "purchases" (in quotes because purchases are usually made with money that was earned).  Of course, none of these movements reflect anything more or less than the idea that there will be ever more money flooding into the system, which will cause things, but especially financial assets, to go higher in price in the future.

The ultra-rich are going to be thrilled with the Fed, and they should really send the Fed a nice gift this year perhaps the deluxe fruit basket, during the holidays.

Combined net worth of America's richest rises

Sep 17, 2013

NEW YORK (AP) -- Life is good for America's super wealthy.

Forbes on Monday released its annual list of the top 400 richest Americans. While most of the top names and rankings didn't change from a year ago, the majority of the elite club's members saw their fortunes grow over the past year, helped by strong stock and real estate markets.

"Basically, the mega rich are mega richer," said Forbes Senior Editor Kerry Dolan.

Dolan noted that list's minimum net income increased to a pre-financial crisis level of $1.3 billion, up from $1.1 billion in 2012, with 61 American billionaires not making the cut. "In some ways, it's harder to get on the list than it ever has been," she said.

(Source)

Fed Speak

In its release, the Fed noted concerns about both rising mortgage rates and the lack of additional excess in fiscal policy from D.C. as being drags on growth. 

They also said this, indicating that they are adopting a 'wait and see' approach:

Taking into account the extent of federal fiscal retrenchment, the Committee sees the improvement in economic activity and labor market conditions since it began its asset purchase program a year ago as consistent with growing underlying strength in the broader economy.

However, the Committee decided to await more evidence that progress will be sustained before adjusting the pace of its purchases.

(Source)

More evidence?

In the past month we've seen articles like these:

If you had told me a decade ago that we could have both headlines like these and an $85-billion-per-month, thin-air money printing program by the Fed, I would not have believed you.  At least not without a plummeting dollar and gold over $5,000 per ounce. 

But we have neither, and the entire investing world is celebrating not only the Fed's largess with wild abandon, but also the efforts of all the other OECD central banks.

If one takes the Fed's words at face value, then one knows that it is not going to do anything until in its judgment, the labor market hits some appropriate threshold, and inflation gets back to a level that it feels gives itself, and the big banks, more breathing room.

In the Fed's own words:

The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months and will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has improved substantially in a context of price stability.

In judging when to moderate the pace of asset purchases, the Committee will, at its coming meetings, assess whether incoming information continues to support the Committee’s expectation of ongoing improvement in labor market conditions and inflation moving back toward its longer-run objective. 

To this, the Fed also essentially promised that interest rates (meaning the Fed Funds rate) would remain near zero until 2015, removing even the option of slight interest-rate tightening for another year.

Taken together, the Fed essentially said, nobody seems to mind that we're printing up enough money each month to bail out southern Europe, our best friends (the 400 richest people on the Forbes list) are applauding us, and the financial markets are giddy, so why stop now?

Boxed In

As I have long argued, the Fed is boxed in and almost certainly will continue to print as much and for as long as necessary. Along the way, everybody knows that the financial markets are becoming more dependent on continued Fed stimulus and that tapering, let alone actual unwinding, becomes an ever harder and more remote possibility.

Further, we all have to try to make sense of the growing gap between the Fed's actions and the reported economic statistics.  After all, $85 billion a month is an emergency amount.  And so we have to ask, where's the emergency?

It's not in housing, or auto sales, or the headline GDP number.  Nor is it in bank earnings or growth in wealth for the already wealthy.

The simple truth, as I see it, is that the Fed now knows that as soon as it takes the punchbowl away, all of the apparent wealth evaporates and the market crumbles.  Here we might note that if several years of truly historic money printing has not yet provided enough self-sustaining recovery, why exactly is it that the Fed thinks more of the same will do the trick?

Something just does not add up in this story.  What is it that they are not telling us?

Well, one thing that really does not fit in this story is that oil over $100 per barrel.  As far as I am concerned, there will be no such thing as a resumption in the type of growth the Fed wishes to see before it willingly begins tapering (end eventually unwinding), because of the price of oil and debt levels that are still far too high.

Which means the Fed will keep on printing money until something happens.  More bluntly, I think the Fed will keep printing until some form of market accident happens that forces it to behave differently. 

When that happens, the Fed will be following, not leading. And many will be cruelly punished for believing that the Fed had some magical ability to re-write economic laws. 

Conclusion

By failing to taper, the Fed has all but admitted that it is quite worried about something that it is not publicly disclosing.  But it's not that hard to read between the lines.  The Fed, along with everybody else, knows that the markets are elevated mainly because of the QE money-printing, and it is desperately afraid to find out just how much elevation it is supporting.  The best guess is a lot.

For now, the whole world seems content to just go along with the story and buy up everything that isn't nailed down, which is just another way of saying don't fight the Fed.

To my way of thinking, this is just inflation, pure and simple, and the Fed has engineered another huge bubble, this one bigger than all the others put together.  It is now our job to figure out when and why this one, too, shall burst.

Again, I consider all of this to be perfectly reckless behavior. We have to be open to the possibility that rather than being a paragon of competence, the Fed is actually staffed with ordinary humans who have no better idea of where this is all headed than anyone else.

With history as our guide, we're pretty confident saying that this ends badly, and given that this is the largest bubble by far, we might even guess that it ends really badly. 

But we can never know the when of such matters, and so we continue to prioritize building resilience at the personal, financial, and community levels. 

~ Chris Martenson

Endorsed Financial Adviser Endorsed Financial Adviser

Looking for a financial adviser who sees the world through a similar lens as we do? Free consultation available.

Learn More »
Read Our New Book "Prosper!"Read Our New Book

Prosper! is a "how to" guide for living well no matter what the future brings.

Learn More »

 

Related content

24 Comments

cgolias's picture
cgolias
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: May 13 2011
Posts: 33
Chances of an Fall Correction and other Entailments

Chris, I suspect others share my interest in how the Fed's suprise lack of taper affects your stated intuition of a market correction occurring this fall. Timing is always the trickiest (a straight answer is not necessary), but does this news push back your general timeframe, or does it suggest to you that the veneer of abundance and functionality is thinning rapidly and the insiders/FED know it? If the later is true, would not that be consistent with the suprise reversal away from Summers in the FED chairman sweepstakes? Afterall, Yellen can be simplicistally called the no-taper candidate while Summers was at least thought to be more hawish/tapery (although I agree with you that he would really do nothing other than serve insiders/big players). I'll open the question up to others too: do other readers have thoughts along these lines?

jtwalsh's picture
jtwalsh
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Oct 1 2008
Posts: 268
Who Else Is There?

In my limited understanding of these matters I have always thought that the bond purchases, either direclty, or indirectly were undertaken to keep the government afloat.  By providing a steady lender for government borrowing the Fed was both allowing the government to continue deficit spending and kept interest rates down by purchasing the bonds at levels private investors, or foriegn governments might not find appealing.  This being my fundamental understanding I was puzzeled the past few weeks as everyone said the Fed was going to "taper" its purchases. I could not come up with a list of likely purchasers should the Fed step away.  If suddenly the government couldn't borrow at will and/or had to pay real world interest rates the true fiscal cliff would be reached.  From this perspective I was not at all surprised by today's announcement. 

I agree fully with your first comment.  The Fed has put itself in a box.  It cannot let government finances collapse for the backlash would be the collapse of the stock and bond markets and ultimately the Fed itself.  The real question now, is how long can people be made to believe that this in not increasing inflation and lowering our standard of living.

epidyne's picture
epidyne
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 9 2011
Posts: 1
Wasn't this part of the plan?

jtwalsh,  I was thinking the same way as you.  That there was never a serious intent to stop bond purchases.  In fact, I would go a step further.  Back when the Fed announced that it may start tapering later in this year, I had a hard time believing that they didn't already know there would be a backlash from the markets.  Therefore, I had a hypothesis that the true intent was nothing as it appeared, and that they would very quickly backpeddle (which they did).  My hypothesis was that perhaps it was a smokescreen to 1.) test the markets and 2.) when the markets reacted negatively (as they figured was most likely), then they could use it as an excuse that "oh well, we were going to taper, but look at how much damage it could cause to mortage rates and the housing market... we better keep injecting for a while".   In short, plausible deniability.  It helps with the act - makes it look plausible that they are ready to stop injecting stimulus (to avoid a run on treasuries), while never actually stopping the injections (to continue to fund the federal government).

Now with today's announcment, this theory seems bolstered.  What do you guys think?

 

Broadspectrum's picture
Broadspectrum
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 14 2009
Posts: 90
What To Do With the Federal Reserve

For those of you that have read, “The Creature From Jekyll Island” this should all sound very familiar to you because it is the last chapter in the book that is unfolding as Griffin predicted in his worst case scenario.  You may want to reread that chapter or for those of you that have not read that book…I suggest you do.

 

Broadspectrum

 

And from

What To Do With the Federal Reserve 
By Michael Busler 
Wednesday, September 11, 2013

 

Many people today want to abolish the Federal Reserve System. The primary reason is that these people fear a severe inflation problem coming very shortly. Why? Over the past four years the FED has been "monetizing" the public debt by purchasing $85 billion dollars per month of U.S. Treasury bonds that are used to pay for the huge annual deficits that the current administration has incurred. Each time the essentially unregulated Fed buys bonds, they inject reserves into the system which increases the money supply. Will this cause the rapid inflation that people are worried about?

 

A new documentary called Money for Nothing directed and produced by Jim Bruce has just been released. This film details the history of the Federal Reserve, and provides excellent information about why the FED should be abolished. Read about it here; If you want to see the movie, click here to see if it is showing in a city near you.

Michael Busler, Ph.D. is a public policy analyst and an Associate Professor at Richard Stockton College.

FreeNL's picture
FreeNL
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 27 2013
Posts: 112
perhaps the FED's

perhaps the FED's stockholders havent had enough time to complete their objectives?

 

Adam Taggart's picture
Adam Taggart
Status: Peak Prosperity Co-founder (Offline)
Joined: May 26 2009
Posts: 3099
Only 27% of US adults even know what QE is

One reason why the masses haven't picked up their pitchforks and torches: they don't even understand what "quantitative easing" is.

From Yahoo! News:

Poll: With the end of Fed's QE in sight, U.S. public says 'Huh?'

The Fed's $2.8 trillion "quantitative easing" program has, among other things, lifted stock prices to record highs, driven interest rates to record lows and put a floor under what had been a reeling housing market.

Yet barely a quarter of Americans even know what it is.

A poll leading up to the Fed's pivotal decision, expected Wednesday afternoon, found just 27 percent of U.S. adults could correctly pick the correct definition of quantitative easing from among five possible answers.

Quantitative easing, or QE for short, is when the Fed buys bonds in order to push down interest rates and boost the economy.

The ongoing Reuters/Ipsos poll included interviews with 857 adult Americans between September 12 and 16. The result's credibility interval, a measure of its accuracy, is plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

A populace that blindly confers so much power to a private entity is complicit in any abuse that ensues.

gillbilly's picture
gillbilly
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Oct 22 2012
Posts: 423
But Wait, The Market Will Soar

Now that we have accomplished our mission of bringing China and Russia back into fold through our Sabre rattling over Syria, the market will go to 20K. Or so the story goes:

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/history-suggests-markets-soar-fed-qe-ends-says-182712192.html

And this is based on history...or is that his story? But wait, QE isn't ending. Oh no, now what? I feel I'm at a schizophrenic party. (me three)

The hangover is going to be a doozy.

Thetallestmanonearth's picture
Thetallestmanonearth
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 28 2013
Posts: 324
27%

With only five possible answers on the survey one could reasonably expect roughly any given answer to receive 20% (1/5) even if 100% of those surveyed were guessing.  That tells me the actual number of people who understand QE id likely far lower even then the 27% revealed by this survey.....gross America, gross.

treebeard's picture
treebeard
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 18 2010
Posts: 609
They shoot horses don't they

 

Those of us thinking and talking about this are getting a bit fatigued, yet only a quarter of the population even knows what QE is? They say the hospital patients that do the best are the ones in complete denial of their condition. Are we surviving all this through pure denial, is this that wile e coyote moment, standing above the canyon on thin air, held perpetually in place by pure ignorance.

They say if you think education is expensive try ignorance. Seems like ignorance is working out pretty well for most of the american public. I catch conversations in the hall about the latest football game or the start up of the fantasy leagues. The latest shows on HBO or some cool TED talk about some arcane subject, some new deal on product x that just came out, etc.. The texture of daly life.

Seems like the sudden collapse fans have got it wrong. If it was impossible for the extend and pretend to go on this long mathematically, then what terms are missing from our equation? Seems like Ben painted himself into a corner a long time ago, paint must have dried by now, I think Ben is leaving the room.

Recently I heard a story in the main stream press that the wealth gap in the US has now reached the point where it was during the robber baron period of our past. It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine. Big industry flipped everyone the bird, hey you want middle class wages, environmental and financial regulations, see you later, were heading to a third world country far from you, when you get hungry enough we'll be back. Regulations have been decimated, middle class has disappeared, hey were back, woo-whoo, lets through a party! Remember those headlines, industry is coming back?

The technical classes that do the work of the uber rich will do fine, we'll have our small piles of PM's and smart investments. It amazing what a large hard working thrifty underclass will do to stabilize the economy. Remember Potter from its a wonderful life? Money printing is just the way to get there. Relax, there will be no collapse, just make sure you wind up on the right is of the tracks when the dust settles.

The tea party will road block the budget negotiations, maybe a new sequester, any bits of money still headed towards the working poor will be eliminated. Corporate welfare, “defense” and security state spending will barely get nicked. To big to fail and jail will just get bigger.  It'll be eighteenth centry London, families starving to death in the streets.

What is it that we are prepping for, solar panels so we and our neighbors get a hot shower once a week, maybe a garden so we can have a few fresh veggies mixed in with our industrial GMO ag gruel in the summer time? We've been here before. First it was slavery, then indentured immigrant labor, then empire and the exploitation of mother earth on a scale we have not seen before.

Is there an alternative, is there really enlightenment, will we trust our own intelligence. Can we go beyond financial survival and organize ourselves differently. No heros or leaders and no ism's. No left or right, just each of us willing to live fully in the present moment, heads in the clouds, but feet firmly planted in the soil of the earth. Can we scale things so we can look each other in the eye, rather than through the electronic fog of a computer screen?

The odds are always tough, but we are at that hundredth monkey moment, where things can be different then they have ever been before. This is such a moment in time as humanity has never seen before, we can do the impossible only if we believe in the future and do our piece, live the gift that we individually have been given and transform the world together. Think big and live an even bigger life. Its time to take risks and dream the impossible.  A collapse will not do the hard work for us that some have hoped for, darker alternatives are in the offing. We all need to roll up our sleeves and do this, what else is there in the world is worth working for?

 

FreeNL's picture
FreeNL
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 27 2013
Posts: 112
Nothing will ever change

Nothing will ever change until limits to greed and power are made and enforced. Im not talking about socialism, communism or any other ism. Just a hard limit on how much crap your allowed to have compared to the lowest fellow man.

do people really need to be billionaires? Even millionaires?

i believe an all out nuclear war will be required before people will accept this simple truth.

thc0655's picture
thc0655
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 27 2010
Posts: 1627
I'm with you FreeNL

I'm with you FreeNL, as long as I'm on the committee that decides who gets how much.

I'm of the opinion that "We have met the enemy, and he is us." As long as human beings are part of the equation we'll have the same problems we' ve always had (more or less). What we need is a power greater than ourselves to serve as our moral compass and empower us to make the changes in ourselves that exceed our current abilities.

cnbbaldwin's picture
cnbbaldwin
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Posts: 59
Captrust -"Non Taper" Market Thoughts

Here is a short piece for those interested in reading a response from a relatively large, but not the "typical" mainstream financial advisor. I thought it was interesting not so much from any detailed analysis it provides, but more from the general tone it sets which begins with it's title "Much Ado about...Nothing?" and concludes with "We remain committed to serving our clients through tragedies and comedies alike".  Reading between the lines, I sense that they have a real feeling of forboding.

http://www.captrustadvisors.com/pdf/CAPTRUST_September_2013_Market_Thoughts.pdf?utm_source=Market+Thoughts%3A+Capital+Market+Assumptions&utm_campaign=57d8e9fc63-Fiscal_Cliff_Market_Thoughts_II_Plan&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_61304a5f6e-57d8e9fc63-48639193

 

Rector's picture
Rector
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 8 2010
Posts: 509
The Catalyst Won't Be On A Chart

Good Morning,

Our cooperative and exhaustive analysis of the true situation (superbly articulated in the 3 E's lens) only serves to provide us with an understanding of the AMOUNT OF PRESSURE in the system.  When everyone is willing to make believe, we can all pretend for a long time.  

Declining wages? - Print and issue SNAP, disability, Cost of Living adjustments etc.

Financial crisis? - Print and bailout as much as necessary

Currency too strong? - Print and weaken to stimulate exports

Nations moving away from Bretton woods? - Print, fund, and invade

As long as the "dollar" in its current form is the World's Reserve Currency, we can throw serious money at our problems and hold them at bay for far longer than would otherwise seem possible.

How then shall the end come?

There will be an outside (non-financial) shock to the world that will begin the failure of the doe eyed confidence the masses have in this edifice of horseshit.  Never forget the powerful forces in the world who REALLY Hate The United States.  We really should start an PP.com pool:

1.  Serious war in the middle east.  Really, need I say more?

2.  Islamic takeover in Saudi Arabia after the king dies - imminent.

3.  Anything that spikes the price of oil again (like 2008?)

4.  A collapse of China's potemkin village.

5.  Any nuclear detonation  - anywhere

6.  Japan's final collapse. etc., etc., etc,

We continue to correctly note that the serious rot is everywhere, and within every governmental, financial, legal, medical, etc. system we see imminent catastrophe.  An exogenous shock will shake the house of cards, and then all the pressures will cascade within a week, snowballing along the way, and sweeping all the sheep into the sea.  We have used the avalanche analogy many times here at PP.com and it has been snowing like hell for five years.  We are truly screwed, but I don't worry about it, because I am prepared.

Fear not!  It will be good for us.

Rector

alfrede's picture
alfrede
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: May 15 2013
Posts: 20
Greenspan, " Fed balance sheet needing tapered"

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100798203

 I wasn't sure what to make of this when he spoke in June; trial balloon, forecasting[taking some of the heat off Bernake] the next Fed move...obviously wasn't this at this point, or maybe thinking of the Fed's [his & Bernake's] legacy as he saw the train wreck ahead. Anyway I didn't see much response this when Greenspan spoke & thought it was very important at that time; & it seemed relevant here to puzzle out what is going on.

lunableu22's picture
lunableu22
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Oct 19 2011
Posts: 41
Endgame?

I'm gonna jump in here with one observation.

A bit back Arthur posted Max Keiser's interview with Jim Rickards.  Towards the end, Jim says that the derivatives casino is so overleveraged that the only "bank" big enough to cover the mess is the BIS or IMF or World Bank (one of these guys), by issuing SDRs globally.  So, in one fell swoop, we have a one world currency, and viola, a one world gov't.  Game over.

LogansRun's picture
LogansRun
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Posts: 1444
Rickards has been trying to

Rickards has been trying to soften the blow of this scenario for years.  He's also a known councelor to the Financial Elite/Banking Cartel so, what he says, is what he's being told to say.  Pretty simple.

CNBC doesn't allow (especially any longer) people to come onto their show unless that person is there to help the cause (Ron Paul Excluded).  

In other words:  Don't trust Rickards.  He's working against the citizen, not for the citizen.

 

lunableu22 wrote:

I'm gonna jump in here with one observation.

A bit back Arthur posted Max Keiser's interview with Jim Rickards.  Towards the end, Jim says that the derivatives casino is so overleveraged that the only "bank" big enough to cover the mess is the BIS or IMF or World Bank (one of these guys), by issuing SDRs globally.  So, in one fell swoop, we have a one world currency, and viola, a one world gov't.  Game over.

pat the rat's picture
pat the rat
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 1 2011
Posts: 120
problems

1) No end to Q.E. progarms by the fed

2) Extraordinarily measures at the treasury dept, just robbing Peter to pay Paul.

3) Goverment shut down maybe at the end of the month.

4) Need to increase the debt limit ?

                                           How long before someone  no more?

                                                                Pat the rat 

 

SagerXX's picture
SagerXX
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 11 2009
Posts: 2239
Not too surprised here...

...although I thought war in Syria/greater ME was going to provide the excuse for no taper.  

So the Fed plunges forward, even further into uncharted territory.  I probably don't need to say to my fellow PP folks that we are, at this point, so far out on the edge of the map that we're even beyond the areas marked only by "Here Thar Be Dragons"...

So the Fed plunges forward, dragging us with them.  Folks can be outraged, or sanguine, or clueless, but other than the vanishingly small number of folks off-grid (literally and figuratively) and disconnected from reliance on the system, we're all riding in the Fed bus driven by Bernanke.  Folks like us are getting into position to hopefully survive the crash when the wheels come off.

So the Fed plunges forward, casting away the last appearance that they're anchored in any sort of reality as we understand it.  All the more reason for us, each and all of us, to continue fashioning anchors of our own -- which will with hard work and good luck, hold us steady through the storm to come.

Family, Community, and resilience preparations (and PMs [+Bitcoin for Jim and like-minded folks!] for those with financial stakes to preserve).  Keep plugging away, y'all.  As our good doctor once said (paraphrasing), when the time comes, it'll happen fast and it won't ask permission...

Viva -- Sager

bewildered's picture
bewildered
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 19 2013
Posts: 3
bond purchases

Ostensibly, the FED is purchasing  productive assets - US treasuries. Does it not follow that tax payers must cover the interest payments? Isn't this a stealth tax? As far as the rest of the junk paper the FED is soaking up, isn't this more TARP, just under the radar this time and not subject to congressional approval?

bewildered's picture
bewildered
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 19 2013
Posts: 3
Stealth Tax and Tarp

The FED balance sheet includes treasuries. The tax payer is ultimately responsible for the interest payments, a stealth tax. The FED balance sheet also includes a lot of junk paper they have kindly paid 18 banks for. This another TARP without congressional approval.

kaimu's picture
kaimu
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 20 2013
Posts: 160
LETS TALK TREASURY SPENDING NOT DEBT

Aloha! Congressional gross spending as stated on each US Treasury Statement includes the cost of debt redemption, except what is uniquely known as "non-marketable debt", which is intergovernment debt. To me it is kind of like non-marketable derivatives like the MBS the US FED buys every month. If there was a market for the stuff then the US FED would not have to buy it.

The years prior to 2009 and the whole Great Monetary Crisis, otherwise known as the GFC in mainstream media, Congress spending was always rising year-to-year, by hundreds of billions. That is until 2009. During that fisal year Congress spending took a huge jump and increased by $3.5TRIL in just one year, to $11.4TRIL. So far this year we are seeing the US Treasury outlays at $11.3TRIL, over $1TRIL per month. In fact September is only half over and gross outlays are at $554BIL as of Sept 16th.

Aside from being a center for cronyism Congress is well known for its inefficiency. Just look at the last debt ceiling debate whereby the S&P essentially lowered the US credit rating due to "political deadlock on debt"! Not because we couldn't pay the interest but because Congress couldn't make any clear decisions on how to pay the interest and more importantly how to control the debt. This boils down to no clear policy. Well, the S&P fails to understand there is a clear policy and that is SPEND-SPEND-SPEND! For me that has been the one policy that Congress has made crystal clear since 1971. But it is also clear that when cronyism dominates then spending in an efficient manner to benefit the greater good is corrupted. No different than tin horn dictators like Chavez.

If Congress has gross outlays of $1TRIL per month it pretty much makes the US FED $85BIL per month chump change. The key is have receipts kept up with outlays on the US Treasury Statement? The clear answer is NO! That means Congress has to issue debt to fill the REVENUE GAAP! Make no mistake that Congress main source of receipts is taxation on all levels, mainly "individual taxes", not corporate taxes. If you consider "net tax receipts" then last year the US Treasury raked in just $1.8TRIL. 

Why would the US FED ever abandon its "creator" in its hour of need? With gross outlays heading above the 2009 highs of $11.2TRIL that impending debt needs to be serviced at the lowest possible Fed Funds Rate(FFR) with the lowest 10yr Treasury rate. It seems that gross outlays tells a story. Then again if you care to see the truth about what the FOMC participants think then go to the details, the charts of their own survey(FOMC June) and see that all of the FOMC participants except one want to tighten in 2015 not 2014. By how much? In 2015 they want to see a FFR at 0.75%! A lot can happen in two years and as we have seen the US FED is not the be all-end all when it comes to controlling interest rates. The US FED is not conducting QE on behalf of the economy it is doing QE to assist Congress spend more at the lowest possible service cost.

The last question I ask is why has gross Treasury outlays risen since 2009 if there is this supposed recovery? All of this does nothing but destroy the purchasing  power of our currency. In that realm we are all the 100%. There is no 1% or 99% ...

bewildered's picture
bewildered
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 19 2013
Posts: 3
How do you arrive at 1 TRIL per month?

The OMB states the proposed 2014 budget is 3.8 TRIL. Just asking...

BeingThere's picture
BeingThere
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 7 2013
Posts: 58
QE to infinity

They can't stop the QE to infinity because when they do the stock market goes down. Every time they mention it the stock market falls and that's all they've got. There's no national economy because the banks and the transnationals are vacuuming up capital, so all that's left is the giant global roulette table. If they let it go interest rates go up and there goes the new housing bubble.

Bubbles are all they have to work with now. They would have to all swallow some bitter medicine if they wanted to straighten this out, but.....NAHHHHHHH

 

KugsCheese's picture
KugsCheese
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 2 2010
Posts: 1449
Wash Rinse

Banks are insolvent on M2M so the wash rinse continues with blind hope.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments