Unless you need drinking water from every tap in the house for some reason, you can get better quality water for a lot less money with an under-sink RO system. With the savings, you could stock up on replacement filters to last you 30 years or so.
I've yet to see a convincing argument for whole-house filtration, especially for a city water user. Water softening, yes, but even that is a trade off; you will be adding sodium or potassium to your water proportionate to the mineral content of the influent. We have significant silt in our water, and the only problem it's ever caused is needing to clean out the toilet tanks more often. We drink and cook with the RO.

I'm getting ready to put in a whole house water filter. I have city water. I have chosen to use a tank that takes bulk carbon, and not use any proprietary filters. I believe lots of filter manufacturers will go out of business, so a proprietary filter is not a good idea, in my opinion.
I am considering adding a UV filter, though my plumber says it is useless, as we do not have any need for it with our city water. The carbon filter is about $1,000, and the UV filter adds an additonal $800. I am wondering in a SHTF scenario, if our city water could become contaminated, if there was a shortage of chlorine that the city adds to the water (or other reasons). Perhaps in that case, the city would just shut off the water.
Any educated opinions out there?
Thanks!